TABLE 3.
Cloning results for populations ofT. mirus andT. miscellus
| Accession/source | Total no. of sequenced clones |
T. dubius clones (%) |
T. pratensis clones (%) |
Recombinant clones (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T. miscellus populations | |||||
| Present day | 2606 | 15 | 7 | 80 | 13 |
| 2605 | 28 | 14 | 68 | 18 | |
| 2604 | 24 | 25 | 58 | 17 | |
| 1 | 15 | 7 | 93 | 0 | |
| 4 | 20 | 30 | 70 | 0 | |
| Herbarium | Ownbey T-93-0; from 1953, Sheridan, WY | 30 | 40 | 53 | 7 |
| Ownbey 3196; from 1949, Moscow, ID | 20 | 43 | 52 | 5 | |
| Accession/source | Total no. of sequenced clones |
T. dubius clones (%) |
T. porrifolius clones (%) |
Recombinant clones (%) |
|
| T. mirus populations | |||||
| Present day | 2603 | 29 | 10 | 69 | 21 |
| 2602 | 21 | 46 | 29 | 25 | |
| 2601 | 31 | 29 | 61 | 10 | |
| 9 | 20 | 45 | 55 | 0 | |
| 21 | 15 | 20 | 80 | 0 | |
| Herbarium | Ownbey 3195; from 1949, Pullman, WA | 17 | 47 | 40 | 13 |
Results were scored for the entire ITS1-58S-ITS2 region.