TABLE 2—
Results of Gender-Specific Logistic Regression Analyses of Behavioral Outcomes at 3-Month Follow-Up: Gonorrhea Community Action Project, 2000–2001
| Outcome | Baseline, % | 3-Month Follow-Up, % | Odds Ratioa (95% Confidence Interval) | P |
| Made appointment for checkupb | ||||
| Female | ||||
| Intervention (n = 95) | 30.5 | 50.5 | 3.04 | |
| Control (n = 51) | 39.2 | 25.5 | (1.81, 5.11) | <.001 |
| Male | ||||
| Intervention (n = 41) | 19.5 | 24.4 | 0.84 | .65 |
| Control (n = 25) | 24.0 | 28.0 | (0.39, 1.81) | |
| Underwent health checkup in past 3 monthsc | ||||
| Female | ||||
| Intervention (n = 88) | 35.2 | 63.6 | 2.87 | |
| Control (n = 45) | 48.9 | 44.4 | (1.39, 5.93) | .004 |
| Male | ||||
| Intervention (n = 41) | 26.8 | 39.0 | 0.74 | .53 |
| Control (n = 23) | 34.8 | 47.8 | (0.29, 1.89) | |
| Talked to friends/family about importance of undergoing health checkup | ||||
| Female | ||||
| Intervention (n = 94) | 35.1 | 73.4 | 4.50 | |
| Control (n = 52) | 44.2 | 46.2 | (2.25, 8.98) | <.001 |
| Male | ||||
| Intervention (n = 38) | 31.6 | 39.5 | 1.13 | |
| Control (n = 26) | 23.1 | 34.6 | (0.56, 2.28) | .73 |
aAdjusted for baseline score and site.
bNonequivalence at baseline between intervention and control groups significant at P < .1.
cNonequivalence at baseline between intervention and control groups significant at P < .05.