Skip to main content
. 2005 Sep;95(9):1582–1587. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.045807

TABLE 2—

Outcome Variables Among Girls Who Attended Control and Intervention Schools

Unadjusted Means (SE)a Race/Ethnicity, BMI, and Wave Controlleda
Control Intervention Control Intervention Adjusted Means (SE)at Follow-Upbc
Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Control Intervention P
≥ 2 blocks of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity/day, % 72.9 (2.3) 70.8 (2.0) 68.6 (2.8) 72.0 (1.9) 73.9 (2.6) 72.0 (1.8) 70.9 (2.1) 69.3 (3.4) 70.3 (2.2) 72.3 (1.8) 0.53
≥ 1 block of vigorous physical activity/day, % 45.6 (3.3) 39.1 (3.0) 40.2 (3.3) 43.0 (3.9) 46.9 (3.2) 44.1 (2.8) 37.6 (3.0) 40.6 (2.9) 36.4 (2.9) 44.5 (2.6) 0.05
≥ 85th percentile of BMI, % 33.3 (2.2) 34.4 (2.0) 33.4 (2.2) 35.0 (2.1) 33.6 (2.5) 35.1 (2.0) 33.3 (2.3) 33.8 (2.1) 33.9 (1.1) 35.0 (0.9) 0.5
≥ 95th percentile of BMI, % 18.5 (1.6) 16.6 (1.5) 18.9 (1.6) 17.7 (1.5) 18.7 (1.9) 16.9 (1.5) 18.2 (1.8) 16.4 (1.6) 17.6 (1.0) 17.7 (0.8) 0.97

Note. BMI = body mass index; block = 30-minute time period.

aThere were no significant differences between the control and intervention schools at either pre- or post-intervention time points.

bANCOVA for physical activity variables, which were controlled for baseline value, wave, interaction of wave and treatment group, BMI, race/ethnicity, and school (N = 1604; control = 741, intervention = 863).

cANCOVA for BMI, which was controlled for baseline value, wave, interaction of wave and treatment group, race/ethnicity, and school (N = 1539; control = 712, intervention = 827).