TABLE 2.

Summary of TRDL positions and their associated genotype and allele frequencies

		DUN homozygote		Heterozygote		IM homozygote		Allele frequency
	Position (cM)	Frequency	HPDIa	Frequency	HPDIa	Frequency	HPDIa	DUN	IM
LG2	77.5	0.36	0.17–0.61	0.48	0.23–0.78	0.15	0.015–0.30	0.60	0.40
LG3	46.4	0.21	0.013–0.52	0.45	0.097–0.77	0.35	0.21–0.68	0.43	0.57
LG5	26.4	0.39	0.10–0.72	0.45	0.068–0.87	0.16	0.0095–0.49	0.62	0.38
LG6	70.7	0.27	0.15–0.40	0.41	0.27–0.54	0.33	0.11–0.45	0.47	0.53
LG7	125.2	0.20	0.12–0.42	0.60	0.37–0.73	0.19	0.062–0.28	0.51	0.49
LG8-1	51.0	0.29	0.056–0.56	0.36	0.11–0.62	0.35	0.13–0.61	0.47	0.53
LG8-2	94.7	0.26	0.055–0.51	0.59	0.37–0.81	0.15	0.052–0.41	0.56	0.44
LG9	61.2	0.25	0.15–0.36	0.32	0.17–0.43	0.43	0.060–0.58	0.41	0.59
LG10	0.3	0.15	0.070–0.23	0.62	0.46–0.80	0.23	0.068–0.38	0.46	0.54
LG11	66.5	0.18	0.087–0.29	0.66	0.55–0.79	0.16	0.082–0.35	0.51	0.49
LG11a	53.0	0.19	0.082–0.29	0.66	0.54–0.79	0.16	0.080–0.37	0.51	0.49
LG12	98.6	0.30	0.041–0.46	0.38	0.21–0.76	0.32	0.14–0.45	0.49	0.51
LG14	0.3	0.44	0.30–0.56	0.38	0.27–0.60	0.18	0.058–0.30	0.63	0.37

Map position of TRDL detected by the Bayesian mapping methodology is shown (Vogl and Xu 2000). Genotype and allele frequencies were estimated from 100 values nearest to the peak (position) of the posterior distributions of individual TRDL.

^aFor each TRDL, the highest posterior density interval (HPDI) at 95% is presented.