Skip to main content
. 2005 Aug;170(4):1485–1499. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.042341

TABLE 2.

Marker rescue ofimmλ from cryptic prophage

Infecting imm434 phagesa
Infected host strains Red+ NinR+ Red+ ΔNinR Δint-red-gam NinR+ Δint-red-gam ΔNinR
Y836b  202 (37) 139 (28) 352 (92)  3 (<1)
Y836 grpD55   22 (9)  59 (1)  44 (13) 2 (1)
Y836 recA   43 (6) 102 (47) ≤1 (<1)  ≤1 (<1)
Y836 recB   24 (1) 527 (332)  35 (5)  2 (<1)
Y836 recD  128 (23) 549 (245)  50 (14)  ≤1 (<1)
Y836 recD recA  197 (38) 189 (50) ≤1 (<1)  ≤1 (<1)
Y836 recD recF 1283 (71) 988 (154) 683 (255) 26 (4)
Y836 recF  259 (32) 135 (25) 132 (23)  ≤1 (<1)
Y836 recF recJ  582 (48) 587 (82)  38 (12)  8 (6)
Y836 recJ  763 (55) 508 (117)   4 (4)  ≤1 (<1)
Y836 recQ  347 (37) 928 (99) 130 (23) 12 (7)

Frequency of immλ marker rescue from cryptic prophage in host (×10−5) for infections carried out at 39°. Standard error is shown in parentheses.

a

Designations used: Red+ NinR+, λimm434; Δint-red-gam ΔNinR, λbio275 imm434 Δnin5; Δint-red-gam NinR+, λbio275 imm434; and Red+ ΔNinR, λimm434 Δnin5.

b

Frequency of immλ marker rescue from cryptic prophage in Y836 (×10−5) for infections carried out at 30° for phages: Red+ NinR+, 7(3); Red+ ΔNinR, 19(2); Δint-red-gam NinR+, 39(20), and Δint-red-gam ΔNinR, 2(1).