Table 2.
Regression Model | Results | |||||||
Backgr. Corr. | Log10 transform | Weight | Baseline drift corr. | Bad fits | Mean R2 | Intra-assay variation | Numerical Bias | |
1 | No | No | No | No | No | 0.9987 | 58 % | 89 % |
2 | No | No | No | Yes | No | 0.9988 | 83 % | 102 % |
3 | No | No | ← | Yes | No | 0.9982 | 80 % | 121 % |
4 | No | Yes | No | No | No | 0.9987 | 59 % | 85 % |
5 | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | 0.9991 | 94 % | 97 % |
6 | No | Yes | ← | Yes | Yes | 0.9986 | 104 % | 130 % |
7 | No | Yes | → | Yes | No | 0.9985 | 101 % | 115 % |
8 | Yes | No | ← | No | No | 0.9978 | 94 % | 166 % |
9 | Yes | Yes | → | No | Yes | 0.9768 | 29963 % | 340 % |
10 | Yes | No | No | No | No | 0.9922 | 83 % | 102 % |
11 | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | 0.9607 | 36336 % | 526 % |
CT | Yes | 24 % |
An overview of the 11 regression models evaluated. In the left part of the table, the modifications of each model are stated. In the right part of the table, key features of the analysis are shown. Arrows in the weight column indicate early plateau phase (←) and late plateau phase (→).