Skip to main content
. 2005 Jun;170(2):899–907. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.035816

TABLE 2.

Results from a reciprocal analysis

Analytical model α β r α̂ β̂
graphic file with name M24.gif
%1 %2 %3
Data simulated by the Luo et al. model
Wu-Ma 0.10 0.14 0.10 0.101 (0.028) 0.139 (0.027) 0.105 (0.028) −687 100 0 0
Luo et al. 0.10 0.14 0.10 0.100 (0.026) 0.139 (0.020) 0.103 (0.029) −688 100 0 0
Data simulated by the Wu-Ma model
Wu-Ma 0.10 0.14 0.10 0.097 (0.031) 0.141 (0.028) 0.100 (0.025) −742 100 0 0
Luo et al. 0.10 0.14 0.10 0.089 (0.026) 0.134 (0.021) 0.113 (0.034) −765 100 0 0
Wu-Ma 0.10 0.30 0.25 0.096 (0.023) 0.295 (0.034) 0.256 (0.036) −683 100 0 0
Luo et al. 0.10 0.30 0.25 0.109 (0.035) 0.209 (0.092) 0.347 (0.112) −691  97 0 3

The data simulated by our (Wu-Ma) and Luo et al.'s models are analyzed by the two models, respectively. The marker cross type for a full-sib family of size n = 200 is the one used by Luo et al., expressed as 1220/1222 × 3455/1130. Inline graphic is the mean of the log-likelihood values obtained from 200 simulations. See Table 1 for explanations of the other parameters.