TABLE 2.
Type I error rates (%) of test cases of Table 1 at a 0.05 significance level
| Error rates when total no. of offspring is
|
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 120
|
240
|
480
|
|||||
| No. of offspring in each family | Test case | LRT | F̂1,a | LRT | F̂1,a | LRT | F̂1,a |
| 1 | Null | 5.0 | 4.9 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Familiality | 5.4 | 5.3 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 5.3 | 5.3 | |
| Admixture | 3.9 | 3.8 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 5.3 | 5.3 | |
| 2 | Null | 4.6 | 4.5 | 4.8 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Familiality | 4.2 | 4.1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 4.7 | 4.8 | |
| Admixture | 5.0 | 4.8 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 4.9 | 5.1 | |
| Linkage | 5.5 | 5.4 | 5.0 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 5.1 | |
| Composite | 5.6 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 5.6 | 5.7 | |
| 4 | Null | 4.9 | 5.0 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 3.6 |
| Familiality | 5.2 | 5.3 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.8 | 4.8 | |
| Admixture | 5.5 | 5.6 | 5.4 | 5.8 | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
| Linkage | 5.3 | 5.5 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 4.9 | 5.0 | |
| Composite | 5.3 | 5.5 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 4.1 | 4.2 | |
| 8 | Null | 4.2 | 4.4 | 5.0 | 5.1 | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Familiality | 4.7 | 5.3 | 5.1 | 5.5 | 4.4 | 4.4 | |
| Admixture | 3.5 | 4.4 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 4.4 | 4.6 | |
| Linkage | 6.1 | 6.8 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.8 | |
| Composite | 5.8 | 6.7 | 5.5 | 5.9 | 3.7 | 3.9 | |
The parameters are the same as those of Abecasis et al. (2000a)(Table 2).