TABLE 5 .
Equilibria and stability predicted by the different patterns of variable selection overDrosophila subobscura andD. pseudoobscuraon gene and genotype frequencies considered for the study (see Figures 1–4 and Table 4) and by the model including all fitness component estimates from Table 3 for both species
|
Drosophila subobscura |
Drosophila pseudoobscura |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixation points |
Internal p̂ |
Fixation points |
Internal p̂ |
||||||
| Fitness component | Regression variables | OST | O3+4+7 | Stable | Unstable | ST | CH | Stable | Unstable |
| Viability | Gene frequencies | — | — | — | — | Unstable | Unstable | 0.785 | None |
| Sexual selection | Gene frequencies | Unstable | Stable | 0.565 | 0.183 | Stable | Unstable | 0.621 | 0.798 |
| Genotype frequencies | Unstable | Unstable | 0.562 | None | — | — | — | — | |
| All | Gene frequencies | Unstable | Stable | 0.668 | 0.082 | Unstable | Unstable | 0.799 | None |
| Genotype frequencies | Unstable | Unstable | 0.667 | None | — | — | — | — | |