Skip to main content
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1989 Nov 1;141(9):897–904.

Correlates of certification in family medicine in the billing patterns of Ontario general practitioners.

C A Woodward 1, M Cohen 1, B M Ferrier 1, C H Goldsmith 1, D Keane 1
PMCID: PMC1451452  PMID: 2804847

Abstract

There is conflicting evidence as to whether physicians who are certified in family medicine practise differently from their noncertified colleagues and what those differences are. We examined the extent to which certification in family medicine is associated with differences in the practice patterns of primary care physicians as reflected in their billing patterns. Billing data for 1986 were obtained from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan for 269 certified physicians and 375 noncertified physicians who had graduated from Ontario medical schools between 1972 and 1983 and who practised as general practitioners or family physicians in Ontario. As a group, certificants provided fewer services per patient and billed less per patient seen per month. They were more likely than noncertificants to include counselling, psychotherapy, prenatal and obstetric care, nonemergency hospital visits, surgical services and visits to chronic care facilities in their service mix and to bill in more service categories. Certificants billed more for prenatal and obstetric care, intermediate assessments, chronic care and nonemergency hospital visits and less for psychotherapy and after-hours services than noncertificants. Many of the differences detected suggest a practice style consistent with the objectives for training and certification in family medicine. However, whether the differences observed in our study and in previous studies are related more to self-selection of physicians for certification or to the types of educational experiences cannot be directly assessed.

Full text

PDF
904

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Borgiel A. E., Williams J. I., Bass M. J., Dunn E. V., Evensen M. K., Lamont C. T., MacDonald P. J., McCoy J. M., Spasoff R. A. Quality of care in family practice: does residency training make a difference? CMAJ. 1989 May 1;140(9):1035–1043. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brennan M., Stewart M. Attitudes and patterns of practice: a comparison of graduates of a residency program in family medicine and controls. J Fam Pract. 1978 Oct;7(4):741–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eisenberg J. M., Nicklin D. Use of diagnostic services by physicians in community practice. Med Care. 1981 Mar;19(3):297–309. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198103000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rosenblatt R. A., Cherkin D. C., Schneeweiss R., Hart L. G., Greenwald H., Kirkwood C. R., Perkoff G. T. The structure and content of family practice: current status and future trends. J Fam Pract. 1982 Oct;15(4):681–722. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sheps S. B., Schechter M. T., Grantham P., Finlayson N., Sizto R. Practice patterns of family physicians with 2-year residency v. 1-year internship training: do both roads lead to Rome? CMAJ. 1989 Apr 15;140(8):913–918. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES