Skip to main content
PMC home page
Immunology logoLink to Immunology
. 1983 Oct;50(2):229–238.

The effect of maternal antigenic stimulation upon the active immune responsiveness of their offspring.

N Yamaguchi, S Shimizu, A Hara, T Saito
PMCID: PMC1454347  PMID: 6352466

Abstract

Pregnant mice were stimulated by sheep erythrocytes (SRBC) and the active immune responses of their offspring were investigated. The offspring whose mothers were stimulated with SRBC did not develop either IgM or IgG plaque-forming cell (PFC) target cells. From the dose response of pregnant mice for inducing suppression, enough doses (10(8)-10(10) cells of SRBC) for inducing primary anti-SRBC PFC could establish suppression in the young. Both intravenous and intraperitoneal administration of SRBC induced almost complete suppression of the specific PFC response (98.6-95.2%), but only partial suppression (57.8%) was induced by subcutaneous injection. For suppression to take place, female mice had to be injected with SRBC from 2 days before fertilization to day 16 of gestation. Suppression of the PFC response was not obtained when SRBC were given 3 days before fertilization or just 24 hr before delivery. This suppressive effect on the PFC response persisted until the 15th week after birth. In these newborn mice, detectable amounts of specific anti-SRBC antibodies were found. After exchanging mothers and newborns, the stimulated newborns fostered by normal mothers were still unresponsive following antigenic stimulation, even though a specific antibody from the mother was not detected. However, normal newborns nursed by stimulated mothers could respond to SRBC injection, no matter how the specific antibodies were transferred. Possible mechanisms of immunosuppression of the PFC response by antibody transmitted by the mother to her offspring are discussed.

Full text

PDF
229

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adler F. L., Noelle R. J. Enduring antibody responses in "normal" rabbits to maternal immunoglobulin allotypes. J Immunol. 1975 Sep;115(3):620–625. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alford C. A., Jr Studies on antibody in congenital rubella infections. I. Physicochemical and immunologic investigations of rubella neutralizing antibody. Am J Dis Child. 1965 Oct;110(4):455–463. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1965.02090030475019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Auerbach R., Clark S. Immunological tolerance: transmission from mother to offspring. Science. 1975 Sep 5;189(4205):811–813. doi: 10.1126/science.1162355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis B. K., Gill T. J., 3rd Decreased antibody response in the offspring of immunized high responder rats. J Immunol. 1975 Oct;115(4):1166–1168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jerne N. K., Nordin A. A. Plaque Formation in Agar by Single Antibody-Producing Cells. Science. 1963 Apr 26;140(3565):405–405. doi: 10.1126/science.140.3565.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kindred B., Roelants G. E. Restricted clonal response to DNP in adult offspring of immunized mice: a maternal effect. J Immunol. 1974 Aug;113(2):445–448. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lang D. J., Noren B. Cytomegaloviremia following congenital infection. J Pediatr. 1968 Dec;73(6):812–819. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(68)80233-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schlamowitz M. Membrane receptors in the specific transfer of immunoglobulins from mother to young. Immunol Commun. 1976;5(6):481–500. doi: 10.3109/08820137609033862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tokuhisa T., Gadus F. T., Herzenberg L. A., Herzenberg L. A. Monoclonal antibody to an IgD allotype induces a new type of allotype suppression in the mouse. J Exp Med. 1981 Sep 1;154(3):921–934. doi: 10.1084/jem.154.3.921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunology are provided here courtesy of British Society for Immunology

RESOURCES