Table I. Characteristics of HCMV- and IE2-induced cell cycle phenotypes.
Cell cycle parameter | HCMV-arrested cells |
IE2-arrested cellsa |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Compared with |
Compared with |
|||
Quiescent | Cycling | p16-arrested | Cycling | |
Rb phosphorylation | ++a,b | +a,b | ++ | 0 |
cycE activity | ++a,b,c | ++a,b,c | ++ | + |
cycA activity | 0a,b,c | –a,b,c | + | – |
cycB activity | ++a,b | +a,b | ++ | 0 |
E2F-induced transcription | ++d | +d | ++ | 0 |
PCNA expression | ++e | ++ |
++, strongly increased; +, increased; 0, unchanged; -, reduced; –, strongly reduced.
The cell cycle state of cells arrested by HCMV infection is compared with proliferating cells (cycling) and with cells arrested by growth factor withdrawal or contact inhibition (quiescent). References b–e have used primary fibroblasts.
aThis study.