Skip to main content
. 2005 Jan 27;564(Pt 1):83–102. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.080622

Table 2.

Changes in area power (μV2) of the kainate-induced oscillatory activity, 60 min after the application of various antagonists and modulators of neural transmission

Antagonist Area power in the presence of 100 nm kainate at 0 min Area power in the presence of 100 nm kainate 60 min after application of the antagonist Recovery after 60 min in the presence of 100 nm kainate alone
NBQX (n= 6) 55.4 ± 41.2 17.2 ± 9.4* 39.5 ± 34.1
d-AP5 (n= 9) 26.3 ± 17.1 30.4 ± 23.0
SYM 2206 (n= 13)  84.5 ± 110.8 61.0 ± 39.6
Bicuculline (n= 7)  64 ± 88.2  36.3 ± 40.2* 56.7 ± 77.2
CGP55845 (n= 4) 23.6 ± 20.8 24.9 ± 20.6
Diazepam (n= 4) 2.9 ± 0.7 3.1 ± 0.9
Atropine (n= 6) 8.7 ± 3.2 9.9 ± 3.4
Mecamylamine (n= 3) 77.9 ± 15.5 77.2 ± 14.1
Carbenoxolone (n= 5) 21.3 ± 13.7 4.4 ± 3.9
Octanol (n= 3) 10.8 ± 8.5 3.3 ± 2.9

Values are mean ±s.d.*Statistically significant change (P < 0.05) from the previous value (see text for details of the statistical tests used).