TABLE 3.
Criteria for grading second papers
Item | Points |
---|---|
On time | 5 |
Primary source identified properly | 5 |
Response to comments on abstract | 20 |
Technical summary | |
Accurate statement | 15 |
Understandability by laymen | 15 |
Nontechnical material | |
Thoughtful/handwaving | 15 |
Writing style | |
Grammatical constructions | 10 |
General interest/style | 15 |
Total | 100 |