TABLE 1.
Comparison with PAML
| Measure | 0 < t < 0.25 | 0.25 < t < 0.5 | 0.5 < t < 0.75 | 0.75 < t < 1 | TMRCA = 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viterbi ML | |||||
| Relative error | 1.1120 | 0.4704 | 0.4173 | 0.2734 | 0.2317 |
| Relative bias | −0.1657 | −0.1043 | −0.1124 | −0.0900 | 0.0067 |
| Coverage | 0.8795 | 0.8878 | 0.8571 | 0.9286 | 0.9300 |
| PAML | |||||
| Relative error | 0.9422 | 0.4913 | 0.4450 | 0.3388 | 0.2762 |
| Relative bias | −0.2737 | −0.1921 | −0.2582 | −0.1527 | 0.1023 |
| Coverage | 0.6406 | 0.6939 | 0.5714 | 0.7857 | 0.7700 |
Measures of accuracy in intervals of scaled time for simulations under demographic scenario i, population of constant size, are shown. We set m = 20 and ℓ = 5 × 105 bp. Partially known tree topologies were used.