Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2006 Jan;172(1):343–353. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.049650

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

Copyright © 2006 by the Genetics Society of America

PMC Copyright notice

Figure 6. — Genetic interactions between tw¹ and rt mutant alleles. (A) The suppression of rt mutant phenotype by the tw¹ allele. The following numbers of flies were analyzed for shown genotypes: males rt^P/rt^P, 73 flies; males tw¹/Y; rt^P/rt^P, 35 flies; females rt^P/rt^P, 30 flies; females tw¹/+; rt^P/rt^P, 83 flies; males rt⁵⁷¹/rt⁵⁷¹, 139 flies; males tw¹/Y; rt⁵⁷¹/rt⁵⁷¹, 143 flies; females rt⁵⁷¹/rt⁵⁷¹, 62 flies; females tw¹/+; rt⁵⁷¹/rt⁵⁷¹, 157 flies; males rt^P/rt⁵⁷¹, 131 flies; males tw¹/Y; rt^P/rt⁵⁷¹, 156 flies; females rt^P/rt⁵⁷¹, 45 flies; females tw¹/+; rt^P/rt⁵⁷¹, 73 flies; males rt^P/rt², 59 flies; males tw¹/Y; rt^P/rt², 67 flies; females rt^P/rt², 50 flies; females tw¹/+; rt^P/rt², 124 flies. Error bars indicate standard deviations. (B) The phenotype of tw¹ homo-/hemizygous mutants is not significantly influenced by the level of rt activity. The following numbers of flies were analyzed for shown genotypes: males −tw¹/Y, 99 flies; tw¹/Y; rt⁵⁷¹/+, 116 flies; tw¹/Y; rt⁵⁷¹/rt⁵⁷¹, 70 flies; females −tw¹/tw¹, 90 flies; tw¹/tw¹; rt⁵⁷¹/+, 102 flies; tw¹/tw¹; rt⁵⁷¹/rt⁵⁷¹, 63 flies. To minimize potential influence of different genetic backgrounds, all these flies were obtained from the same cross: tw¹/Y; rt⁵⁷¹/+ × tw¹/tw¹;rt⁵⁷¹/+. Error bars indicate standard deviations.

Figure 6. — Genetic interactions between tw¹ and rt mutant alleles. (A) The suppression of rt mutant phenotype by the tw¹ allele. The following numbers of flies were analyzed for shown genotypes: males rt^P/rt^P, 73 flies; males tw¹/Y; rt^P/rt^P, 35 flies; females rt^P/rt^P, 30 flies; females tw¹/+; rt^P/rt^P, 83 flies; males rt⁵⁷¹/rt⁵⁷¹, 139 flies; males tw¹/Y; rt⁵⁷¹/rt⁵⁷¹, 143 flies; females rt⁵⁷¹/rt⁵⁷¹, 62 flies; females tw¹/+; rt⁵⁷¹/rt⁵⁷¹, 157 flies; males rt^P/rt⁵⁷¹, 131 flies; males tw¹/Y; rt^P/rt⁵⁷¹, 156 flies; females rt^P/rt⁵⁷¹, 45 flies; females tw¹/+; rt^P/rt⁵⁷¹, 73 flies; males rt^P/rt², 59 flies; males tw¹/Y; rt^P/rt², 67 flies; females rt^P/rt², 50 flies; females tw¹/+; rt^P/rt², 124 flies. Error bars indicate standard deviations. (B) The phenotype of tw¹ homo-/hemizygous mutants is not significantly influenced by the level of rt activity. The following numbers of flies were analyzed for shown genotypes: males −tw¹/Y, 99 flies; tw¹/Y; rt⁵⁷¹/+, 116 flies; tw¹/Y; rt⁵⁷¹/rt⁵⁷¹, 70 flies; females −tw¹/tw¹, 90 flies; tw¹/tw¹; rt⁵⁷¹/+, 102 flies; tw¹/tw¹; rt⁵⁷¹/rt⁵⁷¹, 63 flies. To minimize potential influence of different genetic backgrounds, all these flies were obtained from the same cross: tw¹/Y; rt⁵⁷¹/+ × tw¹/tw¹;rt⁵⁷¹/+. Error bars indicate standard deviations.