Skip to main content
. 2006 Feb;172(2):1009–1030. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.045666

TABLE 3.

Adult pigmentation phenotypes caused by yellow mutants are not predictive of male mating success

yellow allele Wingab Body Bristles Aristae Tarsal claws Sex combs Overall mating successd
y1 +/−c
Df(1)y-ac22 +/−
y59b +/−
y−893 + + + + +
y2 + + + + +
y3P +/− + + + + +
y−300gin + + + + + +
ybl + +/− + + +
y−91 + + +/− +
y3d + +/− +
y2S +/− +/− + + +/−
ya77 +/− +/−
yintronless + + +/− +/− +
y+660R + + + +
y+1310 + + + + + +
a

Pigmentation data are a summary of personal observations by M. D. Drapeau and P. K. Geyer, the primary references in Table 1, Lindsley and Zimm (1992), and FlyBase.

b

Wing, body, bristles, aristae, tarsal claws, and sex combs are adult pigmented structures.

c

“+/−” indicates that the pigmentation is neither completely wild type (dark) nor mutant (yellow), but rather intermediate.

d

The male mating success data are from this report.