Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1996 Jan 15;24(2):375–379. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.2.375

Chip PCR. I. Surface passivation of microfabricated silicon-glass chips for PCR.

M A Shoffner 1, J Cheng 1, G E Hvichia 1, L J Kricka 1, P Wilding 1
PMCID: PMC145622  PMID: 8628665

Abstract

The microreaction volumes of PCR chips (a microfabricated silicon chip bonded to a piece of flat glass to form a PCR reaction chamber) create a relatively high surface to volume ratio that increases the significance of the surface chemistry in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We investigated several surface passivations in an attempt to identify 'PCR friendly' surfaces and used those surfaces to obtain amplifications comparable with those obtained in conventional PCR amplification systems using polyethylene tubes. Surface passivations by a silanization procedure followed by a coating of a selected protein or polynucleotide and the deposition of a nitride or oxide layer onto the silicon surface were investigated. Native silicon was found to be an inhibitor of PCR and amplification in an untreated PCR chip (i.e. native slicon) had a high failure rate. A silicon nitride (Si(3)N(4) reaction surface also resulted in consistent inhibition of PCR. Passivating the PCR chip using a silanizing agent followed by a polymer treatment resulted in good amplification. However, amplification yields were inconsistent and were not always comparable with PCR in a conventional tube. An oxidized silicon (SiO(2) surface gave consistent amplifications comparable with reactions performed in a conventional PCR tube.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (69.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bluth E. I., Lambert D. J., Lohmann T. P., Franklin D. N., Bourgeois M., Kardinal C. G., Dalovisio J. R., Williams M. M., Becker A. S. Improvement in 'stat' laboratory turnaround time. A model continuous quality improvement project. Arch Intern Med. 1992 Apr;152(4):837–840. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cheng J., Shoffner M. A., Hvichia G. E., Kricka L. J., Wilding P. Chip PCR. II. Investigation of different PCR amplification systems in microbabricated silicon-glass chips. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Jan 15;24(2):380–385. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.2.380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Erickson K. A., Wilding P. Evaluation of a novel point-of-care system, the i-STAT portable clinical analyzer. Clin Chem. 1993 Feb;39(2):283–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fodor S. P., Read J. L., Pirrung M. C., Stryer L., Lu A. T., Solas D. Light-directed, spatially addressable parallel chemical synthesis. Science. 1991 Feb 15;251(4995):767–773. doi: 10.1126/science.1990438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harrison D. J., Fluri K., Seiler K., Fan Z., Effenhauser C. S., Manz A. Micromachining a miniaturized capillary electrophoresis-based chemical analysis system on a chip. Science. 1993 Aug 13;261(5123):895–897. doi: 10.1126/science.261.5123.895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Koudelka M., Rohner-Jeanrenaud F., Terrettaz J., Bobbioni-Harsch E., de Rooij N. F., Jeanrenaud B. In-vivo behaviour of hypodermically implanted microfabricated glucose sensors. Biosens Bioelectron. 1991;6(1):31–36. doi: 10.1016/0956-5663(91)85005-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Madou M., Tierney M. J. Required technology breakthroughs to assume widely accepted biosensors. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1993 Apr-May;41(1-2):109–128. doi: 10.1007/BF02918537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Robinson A. Rationale for cost-effective laboratory medicine. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1994 Apr;7(2):185–199. doi: 10.1128/cmr.7.2.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Service R. F. The incredible shrinking laboratory. Science. 1995 Apr 7;268(5207):26–27. doi: 10.1126/science.7701335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shoji S., Esashi M. Microfabrication and microsensors. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1993 Apr-May;41(1-2):21–34. doi: 10.1007/BF02918525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Whitesides G. M., Mathias J. P., Seto C. T. Molecular self-assembly and nanochemistry: a chemical strategy for the synthesis of nanostructures. Science. 1991 Nov 29;254(5036):1312–1319. doi: 10.1126/science.1962191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wilding P., Pfahler J., Bau H. H., Zemel J. N., Kricka L. J. Manipulation and flow of biological fluids in straight channels micromachined in silicon. Clin Chem. 1994 Jan;40(1):43–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wilding P., Shoffner M. A., Kricka L. J. PCR in a silicon microstructure. Clin Chem. 1994 Sep;40(9):1815–1818. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wise K. D., Najafi K. Microfabrication techniques for integrated sensors and microsystems. Science. 1991 Nov 29;254(5036):1335–1342. doi: 10.1126/science.1962192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Woolley A. T., Mathies R. A. Ultra-high-speed DNA fragment separations using microfabricated capillary array electrophoresis chips. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Nov 22;91(24):11348–11352. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.24.11348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES