Skip to main content
. 2005 Sep;171(1):197–210. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.033597

TABLE 5.

Testing the isolation model in D. yakuba and D. santomea

θ1 θ2 θA Inline graphic PSSa Inline graphic PTa WWH PWWHa
X 18.93 15.48 109.59 3.77 0.70 54.24 0.24 26 0.16
0.12–38.01 0.12–32.41 54.98–165.82
2 34.37 23.69 46.98 29.56 0.0075 50.97 0.034 14 0.063
21.00–53.07 15.59–34.62 24.54–69.47
3 28.26 22.75 75.63 4.91 0.80 14.40 0.97 14 0.73
9.52–52.80 7.92–42.60 40.56–120.3
Totalb 76.91 61.15 232.37 33.98 0.46 134.12 0.4 34 0.12
50.29–106.76 40.76–83.68 169.42–308.15
Totalc 78.72 62.54 321.30 4135.15 <0.0001 4382.35 <0.0001 34 0.21
45.65–113.24 37.22–87.60 221.64–411.42

Estimated values of parameters of the isolation model are shown (Wakeley and Hey 1997) as performed in Wang et al. (1997) with 95% confidence intervals based on coalescent simulations.

a

Fractions of simulations with values of Inline graphic (see text), χT2 (see Kliman et al. 2000 for details), and WWH (see Wang et al. 1997 for details) statistics equal to or more extreme than the values observed.

b

Only genes in regions of nonreduced crossing over (17 genes).

c

Regions of nonreduced and reduced crossing over (mtDNA and Y chromosome included, 29 genes).