TABLE 1.

E-Dp110^KD complementation groups and summary of phenotypic analyses

					Enhancement of MS1096>Aosc
Complementation group	Alleles	Enhancement of MS1096>Dp110KD small winga	Minute bristle phenotype?b	Dominant reduction in wing size?	Small wing?	Wing-vein loss?
E-2a	E-2a1	+ + +	No	No	Yes	No
E-2a2	+ + +	No	No	Yes	No
E-2b	E-2b1	+	Yes	No	Yes	No
E-2b2	+	Yes	No	Yes	No
E-2d	E-2d1	+ +	Yes	No	Yes	No
E-2d2	+ + +	Yes	No	Yes	No
E-2e	E-2e1	+	No	No	Yes	No
E-2e2	+ +	No	No	Yes	No
E-2g	E-2g1	+ + +	No	No	Yes	Yes
E-2g2	+ +	No	No	Yes	Yes
E-3c	E-3c1	+ +	No	No	Yes	Yes
pix3c2	+ + +	Yes	Nod	Yes	No
pix3c3	+ +	Yes	No	Yes	No
E-3c4	+ +	No	No	Yes	No
lep3c5	+ + +	No	No	Yes	No
lep3c6	+ + + +	No	No	Yes	No
	E-3c7	+ +	Yes	No	Yes	No

^aThe relative degree of enhancement is a cumulative score that reflects results seen in both female and male wings collected from at least three separate crosses. Approximately, the number of “+” signs corresponds to the mean size of MS1096>Dp110^KD/+; E-Dp110^KD/+ female wings compared to MS1096>Dp110^KD/+ female wings as follows: +, >95%; ++, 91–95%; +++, 86–90%; ++++, <86%. P-values calculated using Student's t-test were <0.01 in every case.

^bNota were assessed for the Minute small and slender bristle phenotype.

^cMS1096>Aos/+; E-Dp110^KD/+ female wings were compared to MS1096>Aos/+ female wings. Wings were scored for significant size (mean wing area) and venation (presence and integrity of vein L3) differences.

^dpix^3c2 heterozygotes do show a mild reduction in wing size when reared under uncrowded, carefully synchronized culture conditions, but not under our standard culture conditions.