Skip to main content
. 2006 May;18(5):1121–1133. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.039834

Table 2.

Summary of Downregulated Genes with Up to Five Mismatches

amiR-lfy-1 amiR-mads-1 amiR-mads-2
Predicted targets, represented on array 1 6 18
Predicted targets, present in control 1 4 13
Predicted targets, present in control and downregulated in amiRNA overexpressers 1 1 6
All genes present in control without predicted targets 15,367 15,364 15,355
All genes downregulated without predicted targets 342 141 287
Genes with five mismatches, present in control 32 89 311
Observed downregulated Predicted targets 1 1 5
Others 1 3 5
Expected downregulated without predicted targets 0.7 0.8 5.6
χ2 0.1 6.4 0.5

Significantly downregulated genes were determined using LIMMA (Smyth et al., 2005), with an expression change of at least 1.5-fold at an estimated 1% false discovery rate (FDR) (Benjamini and Yekutieli, 2001). A χ2 test was used to determine statistical significance of the difference between expected and observed downregulated genes among the nontargets (genes with five or less mismatches, but not predicted targets). A minimal χ2 value of 6.63 corresponds to significant differences at α = 0.01. Use of the logit-T algorithm produced qualitatively similar results. A total of 15,368 genes were called present in Col-0 inflorescences. For amiR-lfy-1, we used the sequence of the 21-mer deduced from the mapping of the cleavage product, which was shifted by two nucleotides from the intended amiRNA.