Skip to main content
editorial
. 2006 May 6;332(7549):1086–1089. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1086

Table 2.

Potential opposing interests of parties affected by access to trial protocols

Supporting access Opposing access
Trial investigators
Ensuring high quality research
Protecting intellectual secrets
Commercial sponsors
Ensuring high quality research
Protecting intellectual and commercial secrets
Non-commercial sponsors
Ensuring unbiased, high quality research, as originally approved
Ensuring transparent, accurate reporting of methods and results

Research ethics committees
Ensuring unbiased, high quality ethical research that is consistent with approved protocol
Minimising administrative burden of retrieving archived documents
Ensuring transparent, accurate reporting of methods and results
Study participants
Expecting transparent, high quality conduct and accurate, public reporting of studies in which they voluntarily participated

Public (especially future patients)
Expecting transparent, high quality conduct and accurate, public reporting of research to guide health care

Journals, peer reviewers, and readership
Ensuring transparent, accurate reporting of methods and results

Governments Ensuring reliable research data for policy making