Table 2.
Deff values of Crt-GFP and ER-GFP after treatment with Cst and Puro
| Construct | Condition | No. | Deff, μm2/s ± SD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crt-GFP | (C) Steady state | 28 | 1.3 ± 0.3 |
| (H) Cst | 25 | 0.9 ± 0.2* | |
| (E) Puro → Cst | 24 | 1.4 ± 0.4† | |
| (F) Cst → Puro | 10 | 0.7 ± 0.2* | |
| ER-GFP | (C) Steady state | 20 | 8.7 ± 2.5 |
| (H) Cst | 20 | 5.6 ± 1.7* | |
| (E) Puro → Cst | 8 | 8.5 ± 2.3† | |
| (F) Cst → Puro | 11 | 9.1 ± 2.6† |
The panel of Fig. 2 that schematically depicts each condition is indicated in parentheses to the left. Statistical comparisons of Deff values were performed by using two-tailed Student t tests.
*Statistically significant change (P < 0.005) relative to the steady-state condition.
†Statistical significance (P < 0.005) relative to the Cst treatment.