Table 1.
Patient | Age | Sex | CD4+ cells/mm3 | Length of infection | Antiviral Drug | Clinical Evaluation |
MB | 28 yr | F | 509 | 11 mo | None | Asymptomatic |
IB | 4.75 mo | M | 1942 | 4.75 mo | None | Asymptomatic |
MC | 23 yr | F | 818 | 1 yr 6 mo | None | Asymptomatic |
IC | 14 mo | F | 772 | 14 mo | ZDV | Symptomatic AIDS |
MD | 31 yr | F | 480 | 2 yr 6 mo | None | Asymptomatic |
ID | 28 mo | M | 46 | 28 mo | ddC | Symptomatic AIDS; failed ZDV therapy |
ME | 26 yr | F | 395 | 2 yr | ZDV | Symptomatic AIDS |
IE | 34 mo | M | 588 | 34 mo | ZDV | Symptomatic AIDS |
MF | 23 yr | F | 692 | 2 yr 10 mo | None | Asymptomatic |
IF | 1 wk | M | 2953 | 1 wk | ZDV | Asymptomatic |
MH | 33 yr | F | 538 | 5 mo | None | Asymptomatic |
IH1 | 7 mo | F | 3157 | 7 mo | ACTG152 | Hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy |
IH2 | 7 mo | F | 2176 | 7 mo | ACTG152 | Hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy |
M: Mother; I: Infant
Length of infection: The closest time of infection that could be documented was the first positive HIV-1 serology date or the first visit of the patient to the AIDS treatment center, where all the HIV-1 positive patients were referred to as soon as an HIV-1 test was positive. As a result, these dates may not reflect the exact dates of infection.
Clinical evaluation for the infants is based on CDC criteria [70]
Mother and infant samples for each pair were collected at the same time