Skip to main content
. 2001 Jan 9;98(2):404–409. doi: 10.1073/pnas.021544898

Table 1.

Summary of results of the analysis of seven scientific collaboration networks

MEDLINE Los Alamos e-Print Archive
SPIRES NCSTRL
Complete astro-ph cond-mat hep-th
Total papers 2,163,923 98,502 22,029 22,016 19,085 66,652 13,169
Total authors 1,520,251 52,909 16,706 16,726 8,361 56,627 11,994
 First initial only 1,090,584 45,685 14,303 15,451 7,676 47,445 10,998
Mean papers per  author 6.4 (6) 5.1 (2) 4.8 (2) 3.65 (7) 4.8 (1) 11.6 (5) 2.55 (5)
Mean authors  per paper 3.754 (2) 2.530 (7) 3.35 (2) 2.66 (1) 1.99 (1) 8.96 (18) 2.22 (1)
Collaborators  per author 18.1 (1.3) 9.7 (2) 15.1 (3) 5.86 (9) 3.87 (5) 173 (6) 3.59 (5)
 Cutoff zc 5,800 (1,800) 52.9 (4.7) 49.0 (4.3) 15.7 (2.4) 9.4 (1.3) 1,200 (300) 10.7 (1.6)
 Exponent τ 2.5 (1) 1.3 (1) 0.91 (10) 1.1 (2) 1.1 (2) 1.03 (7) 1.3 (2)
Size of giant  component 1,395,693 44,337 14,845 13,861 5,835 49,002 6,396
 First initial only 1,019,418 39,709 12,874 13,324 5,593 43,089 6,706
 As a percentage 92.6 (4)% 85.4 (8)% 89.4 (3) 84.6 (8)% 71.4 (8)% 88.7 (1.1)% 57.2 (1.9)%
Second largest  component 49 18 19 16 24 69 42
Mean distance 4.6 (2) 5.9 (2) 4.66 (7) 6.4 (1) 6.91 (6) 4.0 (1) 9.7 (4)
Maximum distance 24 20 14 18 19 19 31
Clustering coefficient C 0.066 (7) 0.43 (1) 0.414 (6) 0.348 (6) 0.327 (2) 0.726 (8) 0.496 (6)

Numbers in parentheses are standard errors on the least significant figures.