Table 3.
Response variableb | Risk factora | Odds ratio | −+95 % CI | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mortality | Weaning weight (≤ 3.6 kg vs > 3.6 kg) | 2.92 | 1.87–4.56 | 0.0001 |
Barrow (barrow vs gilt) | 1.75 | 1.13–2.70 | 0.01 | |
Sow unit (A vs B) | 2.14 | 1.01–4.56 | 0.04 | |
Weaning age (≤ 17 d vs > 17 d) | 0.87 | 0.72–1.06 | 0.1706 | |
Light weight at 10 wk of aged | Weaning weight (≤ 3.6 kg vs > 3.6 kg) | 8.75 | 5.84–13.12 | 0.0001 |
Birth weight (≤ 1 kg vs > 1 kg) | 2.66 | 1.75–4.04 | 0.0001 | |
Gilt (gilt vs barrow) | 1.40 | 0.96–2.04 | 0.07 | |
Sow unit (A vs B) | 2.38 | 1.49–3.70 | 0.0002 | |
Gilt (gilt vs sow at weaning)c | 1.66 | 1.08–2.56 | 0.01 | |
Weaning age (≤ 17 d vs > 17 d) | 1.05 | 0.94–1.17 | 0.34 |
Odds ratio effects are adjusted for remaining factors
Both logistic models included litter as random effect (Glimmix macro; SAS)
Parity of the nursing sow at weaning regardless of the cross fostering status
Less than or equal to 14.5 kg