. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 May 15.

Published in final edited form as: J Early Adolesc. 2004 Nov 1;24(4):326–356. doi: 10.1177/0272431604268530

TABLE 7.

Hierarchical Regression Analyses Predicting Peer-Nominated Rejection and Victimization From Perceived Maternal and Paternal Support and Perceived Friendship Quality (N = 162)

Predictors	B	SE	β	ΔR²
Perceived maternal support
Sex of young adolescent (1 = male, 2 = female)	.06	.13	.04	.00
Perceived maternal support	−.12	.12	−.08	.01
Perceived friendship quality	−.41	.11	−.31^**	.08^**
Gender × Support	−.01	.25	−.02	.00
Gender × Friendship Quality	−.53	.22	−.64^*	.03^*
Support × Friendship Quality	.03	.16	.02	.00
Gender × Support × Friendship Quality	.04	.32	.03	.00
Perceived paternal support
Sex of young adolescent (1 = male, 2 = female)	.06	.13	.04	.00
Perceived paternal support	−.22	.09	−.20^*	.04^*
Perceived friendship quality	−.35	.11	−.27^**	.06^**
Gender × Support	−.11	.18	−.18	.00
Gender × Friendship Quality	−.44	.22	−.53^*	.02^*
Support × Friendship Quality	.05	.14	.03	.00
Gender × Support × Friendship Quality	.35	.29	.38	.01

NOTE: Each predictor was entered as a separate step.

p < .05.

^**

p < .01.