Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2001 Nov;159(3):987–995. doi: 10.1093/genetics/159.3.987

K(+)-channel transgenes reduce K(+) currents in Paramecium, probably by a post-translational mechanism.

K Y Ling 1, W J Haynes 1, L Oesterle 1, C Kung 1, R R Preston 1, Y Saimi 1
PMCID: PMC1461881  PMID: 11729147

Abstract

PAK11 is 1 of more than 15 members in a gene family that encodes K(+)-channel pore-forming subunits in Paramecium tetraurelia. Microinjection of PAK11 DNA into macronuclei of wild-type cells results in clonal transformants that exhibit hyperexcitable swimming behaviors reminiscent of certain loss-of-K(+)-current mutants. PAK2, a distant homolog of PAK11, does not have the same effect. But PAK1, a close homolog of PAK11, induces the same hyperexcitability. Cutting the PAK11 open reading frame (ORF) with restriction enzymes before injection removes this effect entirely. Microinjection of PAK11 ORF flanked by the calmodulin 5' and 3' UTRs also induces the same hyperexcitable phenotype. Direct examination of transformed cells under voltage clamp reveals that two different Ca(2+)-activated K(+)-specific currents are reduced in amplitude. This reduction does not correlate with a deficit of PAK11 message, since RNA is clearly produced from the injected transgenes. Insertion of a single nucleotide at the start of the PAK11 ORF does not affect the RNA level but completely abolishes the phenotypic transformation. Thus, the reduction of K(+) currents by the expression of the K(+)-channel transgenes reported here is likely to be the consequence of a post-translational event. The complexity of behavioral changes, possible mechanisms, and implications in Paramecium biology are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (190.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baulcombe D. C. Molecular biology. Unwinding RNA silencing. Science. 2000 Nov 10;290(5494):1108–1109. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5494.1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brüggemann A., Pardo L. A., Stühmer W., Pongs O. Ether-à-go-go encodes a voltage-gated channel permeable to K+ and Ca2+ and modulated by cAMP. Nature. 1993 Sep 30;365(6445):445–448. doi: 10.1038/365445a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bétermier M., Duharcourt S., Seitz H., Meyer E. Timing of developmentally programmed excision and circularization of Paramecium internal eliminated sequences. Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Mar;20(5):1553–1561. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.5.1553-1561.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen M. L., Hoshi T., Wu C. F. Sh and eag K(+) channel subunit interaction in frog oocytes depends on level and time of expression. Biophys J. 2000 Sep;79(3):1358–1368. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76388-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cogoni C., Macino G. Post-transcriptional gene silencing across kingdoms. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2000 Dec;10(6):638–643. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(00)00134-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dessen P., Zagulski M., Gromadka R., Plattner H., Kissmehl R., Meyer E., Bétermier M., Schultz J. E., Linder J. U., Pearlman R. E. Paramecium genome survey: a pilot project. Trends Genet. 2001 Jun;17(6):306–308. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(01)02307-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Doyle D. A., Morais Cabral J., Pfuetzner R. A., Kuo A., Gulbis J. M., Cohen S. L., Chait B. T., MacKinnon R. The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. Science. 1998 Apr 3;280(5360):69–77. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5360.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ganetzky B., Robertson G. A., Wilson G. F., Trudeau M. C., Titus S. A. The eag family of K+ channels in Drosophila and mammals. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999 Apr 30;868:356–369. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb11297.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Guy H. R., Durell S. R., Warmke J., Drysdale R., Ganetzky B. Similarities in amino acid sequences of Drosophila eag and cyclic nucleotide-gated channels. Science. 1991 Nov 1;254(5032):730–730. doi: 10.1126/science.1658932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Haynes W. J., Ling K. Y., Preston R. R., Saimi Y., Kung C. The cloning and molecular analysis of pawn-B in Paramecium tetraurelia. Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1105–1117. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.3.1105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Haynes W. J., Ling K. Y., Saimi Y., Kung C. Induction of antibiotic resistance in Paramecium tetraurelia by the bacterial gene APH-3'-II. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1995 Jan-Feb;42(1):83–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1995.tb01545.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Haynes W. J., Vaillant B., Preston R. R., Saimi Y., Kung C. The cloning by complementation of the pawn-A gene in Paramecium. Genetics. 1998 Jun;149(2):947–957. doi: 10.1093/genetics/149.2.947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hinrichsen R. D., Burgess-Cassler A., Soltvedt B. C., Hennessey T., Kung C. Restoration by calmodulin of a Ca2+-dependent K+ current missing in a mutant of Paramecium. Science. 1986 Apr 25;232(4749):503–506. doi: 10.1126/science.2421410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim C. S., Preer J. R., Jr, Polisky B. Bacteriophage lambda DNA fragments replicate in the Paramecium macronucleus: absence of active copy number control. Dev Genet. 1992;13(2):97–102. doi: 10.1002/dvg.1020130202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kink J. A., Maley M. E., Preston R. R., Ling K. Y., Wallen-Friedman M. A., Saimi Y., Kung C. Mutations in paramecium calmodulin indicate functional differences between the C-terminal and N-terminal lobes in vivo. Cell. 1990 Jul 13;62(1):165–174. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90250-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lefort-Tran M., Aufderheide K., Pouphile M., Rossignol M., Beisson J. Control of exocytotic processes: cytological and physiological studies of trichocyst mutants in Paramecium tetraurelia. J Cell Biol. 1981 Feb;88(2):301–311. doi: 10.1083/jcb.88.2.301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ling K. Y., Vaillant B., Haynes W. J., Saimi Y., Kung C. A comparison of internal eliminated sequences in the genes that encode two K(+)-channel isoforms in Paramecium tetraurelia. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1998 Jul-Aug;45(4):459–465. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1998.tb05100.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McCormick-Graham M., Haynes W. J., Romero D. P. Variable telomeric repeat synthesis in Paramecium tetraurelia is consistent with misincorporation by telomerase. EMBO J. 1997 Jun 2;16(11):3233–3242. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.11.3233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McCue L. A., McDonough K. A., Lawrence C. E. Functional classification of cNMP-binding proteins and nucleotide cyclases with implications for novel regulatory pathways in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Genome Res. 2000 Feb;10(2):204–219. doi: 10.1101/gr.10.2.204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Preston R. R., Saimi Y., Kung C. Calcium current activated upon hyperpolarization of Paramecium tetraurelia. J Gen Physiol. 1992 Aug;100(2):233–251. doi: 10.1085/jgp.100.2.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Preston R. R., Wallen-Friedman M. A., Saimi Y., Kung C. Calmodulin defects cause the loss of Ca2(+)-dependent K+ currents in two pantophobiac mutants of Paramecium tetraurelia. J Membr Biol. 1990 Apr;115(1):51–60. doi: 10.1007/BF01869105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Robertson G. A., Warmke J. M., Ganetzky B. Potassium currents expressed from Drosophila and mouse eag cDNAs in Xenopus oocytes. Neuropharmacology. 1996;35(7):841–850. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(96)00113-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ruiz F., Vayssié L., Klotz C., Sperling L., Madeddu L. Homology-dependent gene silencing in Paramecium. Mol Biol Cell. 1998 Apr;9(4):931–943. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.4.931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Saimi Y., Hinrichsen R. D., Forte M., Kung C. Mutant analysis shows that the Ca2+-induced K+ current shuts off one type of excitation in Paramecium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Aug;80(16):5112–5116. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.16.5112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Saimi Y., Kung C. Ion channel regulation by calmodulin binding. FEBS Lett. 1994 Aug 22;350(2-3):155–158. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)00782-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sharp P. A. RNA interference--2001. Genes Dev. 2001 Mar 1;15(5):485–490. doi: 10.1101/gad.880001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhong Y., Wu C. F. Alteration of four identified K+ currents in Drosophila muscle by mutations in eag. Science. 1991 Jun 14;252(5012):1562–1564. doi: 10.1126/science.2047864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES