Abstract
A method to measure genomic response to natural and artificial selection by means of genetic markers in livestock is proposed. Genomic response through several levels of selection was measured using sequential testing for distorted segregation of alleles among selected and nonselected sons, single-sperm typing, and a test with records for growth performance. Statistical power at a significance level of 0.05 was >0.5 for a marker linked to a QTL with recombination fractions 0, 0.10, and 0.20 for detecting genomic responses for gene effects of 0.6, 0.7, and 1.0 phenotypic standard deviations, respectively. Genomic response to artificial selection in six commercial bull sire families comprising 285 half-sib sons selected for growth performance was measured using 282 genetic markers evenly distributed over the cattle genome. A genome-wide test using selected sons was significant (P < 0.001), indicating that selection induces changes in the genetic makeup of commercial cattle populations. Markers located in chromosomes 6, 10, and 16 identified regions in those chromosomes that are changing due to artificial selection as revealed by the association of records of performance with alleles at specific markers. Either natural selection or genetic drift may cause the observed genomic response for markers in chromosomes 1, 7, and 17.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (154.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Band M. R., Larson J. H., Rebeiz M., Green C. A., Heyen D. W., Donovan J., Windish R., Steining C., Mahyuddin P., Womack J. E. An ordered comparative map of the cattle and human genomes. Genome Res. 2000 Sep;10(9):1359–1368. doi: 10.1101/gr.145900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Churchill G. A., Doerge R. W. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):963–971. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Georges M., Nielsen D., Mackinnon M., Mishra A., Okimoto R., Pasquino A. T., Sargeant L. S., Sorensen A., Steele M. R., Zhao X. Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling milk production in dairy cattle by exploiting progeny testing. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):907–920. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gomez-Raya L. Biased estimation of the recombination fraction using half-sib families and informative offspring. Genetics. 2001 Mar;157(3):1357–1367. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.3.1357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gomez-Raya L., Klemetsdal G. Two-stage selection strategies utilizing marker-quantitative trait locus information and individual performance. J Anim Sci. 1999 Aug;77(8):2008–2018. doi: 10.2527/1999.7782008x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li H. H., Gyllensten U. B., Cui X. F., Saiki R. K., Erlich H. A., Arnheim N. Amplification and analysis of DNA sequences in single human sperm and diploid cells. Nature. 1988 Sep 29;335(6189):414–417. doi: 10.1038/335414a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spielman R. S., McGinnis R. E., Ewens W. J. Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Mar;52(3):506–516. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weller J. I., Kashi Y., Soller M. Power of daughter and granddaughter designs for determining linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 1990 Sep;73(9):2525–2537. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78938-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]