Table 1.
Percent of AA or NHW Person-intervals in Which the Characteristic Was Reported | ||
---|---|---|
Characteristic (Number of Person-intervals) | AA | NHW |
Predisposing Variables | ||
Approach to dental care | ||
Consistent regular attender (1,405) | 19 | 54* |
Inconsistent regular attender (335) | 9 | 11 |
Inconsistent problem-oriented attender (313) | 11 | 10 |
Consistent problem-oriented attender (1,068) | 61 | 25 |
Frustration with past dental care | ||
Yes (485) | 12 | 17ns |
No (2,645) | 88 | 83 |
Would use homemade remedy | ||
Yes (360) | 14 | 11ns |
No (2,714) | 86 | 89 |
Gender | ||
Female (1,761) | 59 | 55ns |
Male (1,378) | 41 | 45 |
Enabling Variables | ||
Ability to pay an unexpected $500 dental bill | ||
Able to pay comfortably (1,481) | 23 | 56* |
Able to pay, but with difficulty (1,246) | 51 | 36 |
Not able to pay the bill (402) | 26 | 9 |
Had dental insurance | ||
Yes (1,068) | 29 | 36ns |
No (2,067) | 71 | 64 |
Need Variables | ||
Had toothache or abscess | ||
Yes (530) | 20 | 16* |
No (2,591) | 80 | 84 |
Had dental cavities | ||
Yes (466) | 20 | 13* |
No (2,601) | 80 | 87 |
Had loose tooth | ||
Yes (344) | 21 | 8* |
No (2,778) | 79 | 92 |
Had broken tooth | ||
Yes (452) | 18 | 13* |
No (2,659) | 82 | 87 |
Had broken filling | ||
Yes (252) | 7 | 9ns |
No (2,861) | 93 | 91 |
Had oral disadvantage due to disease or tissue damage | ||
Yes (368) | 20 | 9* |
No (2,763) | 80 | 91 |
Satisfaction with dental appearance | ||
Very satisfied (744) | 18 | 26ns |
Satisfied (1,714) | 51 | 56 |
Dissatisfied (541) | 26 | 14 |
Very dissatisfied (122) | 6 | 3 |
Perceived need for dental care due to a specific problem | ||
Yes (858) | 40 | 23* |
No (2,254) | 60 | 77 |
Note: Interview data were taken from each six-monthly interview. Each time one participant completed a six-monthly interview, one person-interval was completed. For fixed characteristics (predisposing and enabling variables), the sample sizes used for statistical testing were those from baseline.
The association between race and the characteristic being tested was statistically significant, p <0.05.
The association was not statistically significant.