Skip to main content
. 2003 Jul;1(2):97–104. doi: 10.1370/afm.49

Table 2.

Percentage of Clinicians in Each Discipline Practicing in Underserved Areas, by Type of Underserved Area

Rural Area % (95% CI) Vulnerable Population Area % (95% CI) HPSA % (95% CI)
California
Population* 13.0 39.0 28.0
Family physicians 13.2 (12.5–13.9) 30.5 (29.5–31.5) 24.2 (23.3–25.1)
General pediatricians 6.2 (5.5–6.9) 31.0 (29.6–32.4) 18.6 (17.5–19.7)
General internists 5.9 (5.4–6.4) 31.5 (30.5–32.5) 17.9 (17.1–18.7)
Obstetrician-gynecologists 6.3 (5.5–7.1) 28.3 (26.8–29.8) 16.9 (15.7–18.1)
Nurse practitioners 15.0 (13.6–16.4) 34.4 (32.5–36.3) 26.3 (24.6–28.0)
Physician assistants 21.7 (18.9–24.5) 47.7 (44.3–51.1) 35.2 (32.0–38.4)
Certified nurse-midwives 15.5 (12.0–19.0) 41.1 (36.4–45.8) 35.3 (30.7–39.9)
Washington
Population* 24.0 40.0 38.6
Family physicians 23.6 (21.8–25.3) 45.6 (43.5–47.6) 43.5 (41.5–45.6)
General pediatricians 14.3 (11.5–17.1) 43.5 (39.6–47.4) 32.8 (29.1–36.5)
General internists 13.8 (11.8–15.9) 54.5 (51.6–57.4) 28.4 (25.8–31.1)
Obstetrician-gynecologists 13.7 (10.8–16.6) 52.9 (48.7–57.1) 31.6 (27.7–35.5)
Nurse practitioners 19.7 (15.9–23.5) 51.8 (47.0–56.6) 37.3 (32.7–42.0)
Physician assistants 27.8 (23.7–31.9) 50.3 (45.8–54.7) 42.1 (37.6–46.6)

CI = confidence interval, HPSA = primary care health profession shortage area.

*Percent of state’s population residing in each type of underserved area.

P < .001 for comparisons of percentages across disciplines in each state for each type of underserved area.