Skip to main content
. 2004 May;2(3):267–273. doi: 10.1370/afm.21

Table 3.

Possibly Effective Nonsurgical Treatments for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Treatment Initial Success Long-Term Success Evidence Advantages Disadvantages
Laser-acupuncture Reduction in night pain but not paraesthesia Unknown 1 poor-quality RCT14 Possible preoperative analgesic agent Poor availability
Nerve and tendon gliding exercises No significant difference for Phalen’s or Tinel’s sign, or nerve conduction studies Significantly reduced rates of surgery Before-and-after study using historical controls26 Noninvasive Reduced surgical rates may result from confounders
NNT = 4
Ultrasound One study suggested improvement in both symptoms and nerve conduction studies19; other study found no significant difference25 Unknown 2 RCTs19,25 Noninvasive Expensive
Conflicting evidence High dropout rate
Wrist splinting Neutral superior to 20o extension splinting Unknown 1 systematic review35 plus 1 RCT19 No harmful effects noted Poor compliance
Full-time use significantly greater improvement in nerve conduction studies but no difference in symptoms All studies had methodological flaws
Yoga Significant improvement in Phalen’s sign, grip strength, and pain reduction but not Tinel’s sign, sleep disturbance, or nerve conduction studies Unknown RCT (single-blind)21 Noninvasive No changes in nerve conduction studies
Can be home-based treatment
Involves high level of patient commitment
Control group had wrist splinting.

RCT = randomized controlled trial; NNT = number needed to treat.