Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1997 Jun 15;25(12):2381–2388. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.12.2381

Introduction of precise alterations into the mouse genome with high efficiency by stable tag-exchange gene targeting: implications for gene targeting in ES cells.

L M Whyatt 1, P D Rathjen 1
PMCID: PMC146761  PMID: 9171089

Abstract

The efficiency of tag-and-exchange gene targeting approaches for the introduction of precise genomic modifications is compromised by high levels of non-homologous recombinants which survive selection due to loss of tag gene expression, often by physical loss of the tag gene. We describe a modified approach, termed stable tag-exchange, which incorporates an additional positive selection (stability) cassette to circumvent this limitation. HPRT (tag) and neo (stability) cassettes, separated by 4.9 kb of homologous DNA, were introduced efficiently into the LIF locus of ES cells. The tag cassette was substituted for abeta-galactosidase gene in exchange step targeting. Direct comparison of the tag-and-exchange and stable tag-exchange approaches indicated respective targeting efficiencies of 21% and 88%. The increased stable tag-exchange targeting efficiency resulted from elimination of >75% of background lines which survived tag-and-exchange selection due to physical loss of the tag gene. These resulted from reversion of the tagged allele to wild-type which is therefore a major contributor to tag-and-exchange targeting background. Our results extend the application of gene targeting by demonstrating a rationale for single-step integration of multiple regions of extended non-homology, and providing an efficient system for the repeated introduction of precise alterations into the mammalian genome.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (149.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Askew G. R., Doetschman T., Lingrel J. B. Site-directed point mutations in embryonic stem cells: a gene-targeting tag-and-exchange strategy. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Jul;13(7):4115–4124. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.7.4115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bianchi M. E., Radding C. M. Insertions, deletions and mismatches in heteroduplex DNA made by recA protein. Cell. 1983 Dec;35(2 Pt 1):511–520. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90185-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradley A., Hasty P., Davis A., Ramirez-Solis R. Modifying the mouse: design and desire. Biotechnology (N Y) 1992 May;10(5):534–539. doi: 10.1038/nbt0592-534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bronson S. K., Smithies O. Altering mice by homologous recombination using embryonic stem cells. J Biol Chem. 1994 Nov 4;269(44):27155–27158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Caspersson T., Zech L., Johansson C. Differential binding of alkylating fluorochromes in human chromosomes. Exp Cell Res. 1970 Jun;60(3):315–319. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90523-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cavenee W. K., Dryja T. P., Phillips R. A., Benedict W. F., Godbout R., Gallie B. L., Murphree A. L., Strong L. C., White R. L. Expression of recessive alleles by chromosomal mechanisms in retinoblastoma. 1983 Oct 27-Nov 2Nature. 305(5937):779–784. doi: 10.1038/305779a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DasGupta C., Radding C. M. Polar branch migration promoted by recA protein: effect of mismatched base pairs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Feb;79(3):762–766. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.3.762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Detloff P. J., Lewis J., John S. W., Shehee W. R., Langenbach R., Maeda N., Smithies O. Deletion and replacement of the mouse adult beta-globin genes by a "plug and socket" repeated targeting strategy. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Oct;14(10):6936–6943. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.10.6936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Evans M. J., Kaufman M. H. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature. 1981 Jul 9;292(5819):154–156. doi: 10.1038/292154a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Folger K. R., Wong E. A., Wahl G., Capecchi M. R. Patterns of integration of DNA microinjected into cultured mammalian cells: evidence for homologous recombination between injected plasmid DNA molecules. Mol Cell Biol. 1982 Nov;2(11):1372–1387. doi: 10.1128/mcb.2.11.1372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gondo Y., Nakamura K., Nakao K., Sasaoka T., Ito K., Kimura M., Katsuki M. Gene replacement of the p53 gene with the lacZ gene in mouse embryonic stem cells and mice by using two steps of homologous recombination. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994 Jul 29;202(2):830–837. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1994.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gu H., Zou Y. R., Rajewsky K. Independent control of immunoglobulin switch recombination at individual switch regions evidenced through Cre-loxP-mediated gene targeting. Cell. 1993 Jun 18;73(6):1155–1164. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90644-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hasty P., Rivera-Pérez J., Bradley A. The role and fate of DNA ends for homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Jun;12(6):2464–2474. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.6.2464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hayden M. S., Byers B. Minimal extent of homology required for completion of meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Dev Genet. 1992;13(6):498–514. doi: 10.1002/dvg.1020130611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hilton D. J. LIF: lots of interesting functions. Trends Biochem Sci. 1992 Feb;17(2):72–76. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(92)90505-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hooper M. L., Slack C. Metabolic co-operation in HGPRT+ and HGPRT- embryonal carcinoma cells. Dev Biol. 1977 Feb;55(2):271–284. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90172-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hooper M., Hardy K., Handyside A., Hunter S., Monk M. HPRT-deficient (Lesch-Nyhan) mouse embryos derived from germline colonization by cultured cells. Nature. 1987 Mar 19;326(6110):292–295. doi: 10.1038/326292a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kucherlapati R. S., Eves E. M., Song K. Y., Morse B. S., Smithies O. Homologous recombination between plasmids in mammalian cells can be enhanced by treatment of input DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 May;81(10):3153–3157. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.10.3153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Laird P. W., Zijderveld A., Linders K., Rudnicki M. A., Jaenisch R., Berns A. Simplified mammalian DNA isolation procedure. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Aug 11;19(15):4293–4293. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.15.4293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Le Mouellic H., Lallemand Y., Brûlet P. Homeosis in the mouse induced by a null mutation in the Hox-3.1 gene. Cell. 1992 Apr 17;69(2):251–264. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90406-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Martin G. R. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Dec;78(12):7634–7638. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.12.7634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Metcalf D. Leukemia inhibitory factor--a puzzling polyfunctional regulator. Growth Factors. 1992;7(3):169–173. doi: 10.3109/08977199209046921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Michalska A. E., Choo K. H. Targeting and germ-line transmission of a null mutation at the metallothionein I and II loci in mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 1;90(17):8088–8092. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.17.8088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mountford P., Zevnik B., Düwel A., Nichols J., Li M., Dani C., Robertson M., Chambers I., Smith A. Dicistronic targeting constructs: reporters and modifiers of mammalian gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 May 10;91(10):4303–4307. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Olson E. N., Arnold H. H., Rigby P. W., Wold B. J. Know your neighbors: three phenotypes in null mutants of the myogenic bHLH gene MRF4. Cell. 1996 Apr 5;85(1):1–4. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81073-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Peschon J. J., Behringer R. R., Brinster R. L., Palmiter R. D. Spermatid-specific expression of protamine 1 in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(15):5316–5319. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rathjen P. D., Toth S., Willis A., Heath J. K., Smith A. G. Differentiation inhibiting activity is produced in matrix-associated and diffusible forms that are generated by alternate promoter usage. Cell. 1990 Sep 21;62(6):1105–1114. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90387-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Reid L. H., Gregg R. G., Smithies O., Koller B. H. Regulatory elements in the introns of the human HPRT gene are necessary for its expression in embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(11):4299–4303. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.11.4299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sauer B., Henderson N. Site-specific DNA recombination in mammalian cells by the Cre recombinase of bacteriophage P1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jul;85(14):5166–5170. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.14.5166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stacey A., Schnieke A., McWhir J., Cooper J., Colman A., Melton D. W. Use of double-replacement gene targeting to replace the murine alpha-lactalbumin gene with its human counterpart in embryonic stem cells and mice. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;14(2):1009–1016. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.2.1009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Stahl J., Gearing D. P., Willson T. A., Brown M. A., King J. A., Gough N. M. Structural organization of the genes for murine and human leukemia inhibitory factor. Evolutionary conservation of coding and non-coding regions. J Biol Chem. 1990 May 25;265(15):8833–8841. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Stewart C. L., Kaspar P., Brunet L. J., Bhatt H., Gadi I., Köntgen F., Abbondanzo S. J. Blastocyst implantation depends on maternal expression of leukaemia inhibitory factor. Nature. 1992 Sep 3;359(6390):76–79. doi: 10.1038/359076a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Thomas K. R., Capecchi M. R. Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell. 1987 Nov 6;51(3):503–512. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90646-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Thomas K. R., Folger K. R., Capecchi M. R. High frequency targeting of genes to specific sites in the mammalian genome. Cell. 1986 Feb 14;44(3):419–428. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90463-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Thomas P. Q., Johnson B. V., Rathjen J., Rathjen P. D. Sequence, genomic organization, and expression of the novel homeobox gene Hesx1. J Biol Chem. 1995 Feb 24;270(8):3869–3875. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.8.3869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wu H., Liu X., Jaenisch R. Double replacement: strategy for efficient introduction of subtle mutations into the murine Col1a-1 gene by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 29;91(7):2819–2823. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES