Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Anatomy logoLink to Journal of Anatomy
. 1998 Feb;192(Pt 2):233–244. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19220233.x

Variation in the apparent density of human mandibular bone with age and dental status

V J KINGSMILL 1,✉, A BOYDE 1,✉
PMCID: PMC1467757  PMID: 9643424

Abstract

This study examines the variability in the anatomy of mandibles of differing ages and different stages of tooth loss. Mandibles from individuals between 19 and 96 y were sectioned into 2 mm thick vertical plane-parallel slices and cleaned of marrow and periosteum. The apparent density (mass per unit volume in g/ml) from midline (MID) and mental foramen region (MF) sites was determined by weighing the slices and dividing by a volume calculated as the product of section thickness and the mean area of the 2 sides of the section. The cortical thickness of the inferior border and the basal and alveolar bone heights were measured in radiographs of the slices. Mandibular apparent density was negatively correlated with the cross sectional area (midline r=−0.48, mental foramen r=−0.45), and at the midline was significantly greater in edentulous than in dentate individuals (means (± s.e.m.) edentulous n=13: 1.43 (±0.07) g/ml; dentate n=17: 1.27 (±0.04) g/ml, P<0.05). Where a large enough age range was available, mandibular apparent bone density showed a significant increase with age (midline males: r=0.53, n=18) especially for dentate individuals (r=0.91, n=8). There was a correlation between the apparent densities at the two sites in the same mandible (r=0.64), with the values obtained for the midline being significantly greater than for the mental foramen region (midline 1.34 (±0.04) g/ml; mental foramen 1.19 (±0.04) g/ml, P<0.001, paired t test). The mandible shows great interindividual variability, but there may be a considerable reduction in cross sectional girth of the mandible following tooth loss, and, unlike postcranial sites, an increase in apparent density with age.

Keywords: Ageing, osteoporosis, alveolar ridge

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (807.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Atkinson P. J. Structural aspects of ageing bone. Gerontologia. 1969;15(2):171–173. doi: 10.1159/000211684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkinson P. J., Woodhead C. Changes in human mandibular structure with age. Arch Oral Biol. 1968 Dec;13(12):1453–1464. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(68)90027-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benson B. W., Prihoda T. J., Glass B. J. Variations in adult cortical bone mass as measured by a panoramic mandibular index. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1991 Mar;71(3):349–356. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(91)90314-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bras J., van Ooij C. P., Abraham-Inpijn L., Kusen G. J., Wilmink J. M. Radiographic interpretation of the mandibular angular cortex: A diagnostic tool in metabolic bone loss. Part I. Normal state. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982 May;53(5):541–545. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(82)90473-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Buckland-Wright J. C. A new high-definition microfocal X-ray unit. Br J Radiol. 1989 Mar;62(735):201–208. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-62-735-201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buckland-Wright J. C., Bradshaw C. R. Clinical applications of high-definition microfocal radiography. Br J Radiol. 1989 Mar;62(735):209–217. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-62-735-209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carlsson G. E., Persson G. Morphologic changes of the mandible after extraction and wearing of dentures. A longitudinal, clinical, and x-ray cephalometric study covering 5 years. Odontol Revy. 1967;18(1):27–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Daegling D. J., Ravosa M. J., Johnson K. R., Hylander W. L. Influence of teeth, alveoli, and periodontal ligaments on torsional rigidity in human mandibles. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1992 Sep;89(1):59–72. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330890106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. De Aguiar A. E., Klein A. I., Beck J. O., Jr Spongy bone architecture of edentulous mandibles: a television radiographic evaluation. J Prosthet Dent. 1968 Jan;19(1):12–21. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(68)90005-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hirai T., Ishijima T., Hashikawa Y., Yajima T. Osteoporosis and reduction of residual ridge in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Jan;69(1):49–56. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90240-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Horner K., Devlin H. Clinical bone densitometric study of mandibular atrophy using dental panoramic tomography. J Dent. 1992 Feb;20(1):33–37. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(92)90007-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hylander W. L. Mandibular function in Galago crassicaudatus and Macaca fascicularis: an in vivo approach to stress analysis of the mandible. J Morphol. 1979 Feb;159(2):253–296. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051590208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jäger A., Radlanski R. J., Taufall D., Klein C., Steinhöfel N., Döler W. Quantitative determination of alveolar bone density using digital image analysis of microradiographs. Anat Anz. 1990;170(3-4):171–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kingsmill V. J., Boyde A. Mineralisation density of human mandibular bone: quantitative backscattered electron image analysis. J Anat. 1998 Feb;192(Pt 2):245–256. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19220245.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Klemetti E., Kolmakov S., Kröger H. Pantomography in assessment of the osteoporosis risk group. Scand J Dent Res. 1994 Feb;102(1):68–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1994.tb01156.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Korioth T. W., Romilly D. P., Hannam A. G. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of the dentate human mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1992 May;88(1):69–96. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330880107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kribbs P. J., Chesnut C. H., 3rd, Ott S. M., Kilcoyne R. F. Relationships between mandibular and skeletal bone in an osteoporotic population. J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Dec;62(6):703–707. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90596-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kribbs P. J. Comparison of mandibular bone in normal and osteoporotic women. J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Feb;63(2):218–222. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90108-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kribbs P. J., Smith D. E., Chesnut C. H., 3rd Oral findings in osteoporosis. Part II: Relationship between residual ridge and alveolar bone resorption and generalized skeletal osteopenia. J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Nov;50(5):719–724. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90215-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. PARFITT G. J. An investigation of the normal variations in alveolar bone trabeculation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1962 Dec;15:1453–1463. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(62)90409-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Reid S. A., Boyde A. Changes in the mineral density distribution in human bone with age: image analysis using backscattered electrons in the SEM. J Bone Miner Res. 1987 Feb;2(1):13–22. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650020104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Snyder R. G., Burdi A., Gaul G. A rapid technique for preparation of human fetal and adult skeletal material. J Forensic Sci. 1975 Jul;20(3):576–580. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Taguchi A., Tanimoto K., Suei Y., Otani K., Wada T. Oral signs as indicators of possible osteoporosis in elderly women. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995 Nov;80(5):612–616. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(05)80158-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent. 1972 Feb;27(2):120–132. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(72)90188-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ulm C. W., Solar P., Ulm M. R., Matejka M. Sex-related changes in the bone mineral content of atrophic mandibles. Calcif Tissue Int. 1994 Mar;54(3):203–207. doi: 10.1007/BF00301679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wical K. E., Swoope C. C. Studies of residual ridge resorption. I. Use of panoramic radiographs for evaluation and classification of mandibular resorption. J Prosthet Dent. 1974 Jul;32(1):7–12. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(74)90093-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. von Wowern N., Stoltze K. Comparative bone morphometric analysis of mandibles and 2nd metacarpals. Scand J Dent Res. 1979 Oct;87(5):358–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1979.tb00694.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. von Wowern N., Stoltze K. Pattern of age related bone loss in mandibles. Scand J Dent Res. 1980 Apr;88(2):134–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1980.tb01205.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. von Wowern N. Variations in bone mass within the cortices of the mandible. Scand J Dent Res. 1977 Sep;85(6):444–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1977.tb00578.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Anatomy are provided here courtesy of Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

RESOURCES