Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1997 Jul 1;25(13):2681–2682. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.13.2681

Isolation of rare transcripts by representational difference analysis.

M J O'Neill 1, A H Sinclair 1
PMCID: PMC146778  PMID: 9185582

Abstract

Representational difference analysis (RDA) is a powerful technique for cloning the differences between genomes, and has recently been adapted for cloning differentially expressed genes. RDA, like other PCR-based differential screening methods, is prone to the production of false positives. We have identified a major source of false positives in RDA of cDNA and have introduced improvements which minimise their production. These modifications also significantly increase sensitivity, allowing for the isolation of rare differential transcripts from nanogram amounts of mRNA.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (61.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bertioli D. J., Schlichter U. H., Adams M. J., Burrows P. R., Steinbiss H. H., Antoniw J. F. An analysis of differential display shows a strong bias towards high copy number mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Nov 11;23(21):4520–4523. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.21.4520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hubank M., Schatz D. G. Identifying differences in mRNA expression by representational difference analysis of cDNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Dec 25;22(25):5640–5648. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.25.5640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ko M. S. An 'equalized cDNA library' by the reassociation of short double-stranded cDNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Oct 11;18(19):5705–5711. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.19.5705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Liang P., Pardee A. B. Differential display of eukaryotic messenger RNA by means of the polymerase chain reaction. Science. 1992 Aug 14;257(5072):967–971. doi: 10.1126/science.1354393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lisitsyn N., Lisitsyn N., Wigler M. Cloning the differences between two complex genomes. Science. 1993 Feb 12;259(5097):946–951. doi: 10.1126/science.8438152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McClelland M., Mathieu-Daude F., Welsh J. RNA fingerprinting and differential display using arbitrarily primed PCR. Trends Genet. 1995 Jun;11(6):242–246. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)89058-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Schena M., Shalon D., Davis R. W., Brown P. O. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science. 1995 Oct 20;270(5235):467–470. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5235.467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Welsh J., Chada K., Dalal S. S., Cheng R., Ralph D., McClelland M. Arbitrarily primed PCR fingerprinting of RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Oct 11;20(19):4965–4970. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.19.4965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES