TABLE 4—

Results of Multilevel Logistic Model of Reports of Sexual Coercion of Wife in Preceding Year: Male Reproductive Health Survey, Uttar Pradesh, India, 1995

	Coefficient (SE)
	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3
Individual-level variables
Husband’s education, y (reference: none)
1–6	0.150 (0.103)	0.149 (0.103)	0.147 (0.103)
≥ 7	0.182 (0.080)*	0.181 (0.081)*	0.159 (0.081)*
Wife’s education, y (reference: none)
1–6	−0.105 (0.154)	−0.108 (0.154)	0.101 (0.154)
≥ 7	−0.146 (0.148)	−0.117 (0.149)	−0.107 (0.149)
Household asset indexa
1–2	−0.068 (0.096)	−0.070 (0.096)	−0.104 (0.097)
3–4	−0.144 (0.103)	−0.157 (0.103)	−0.179 (0.103)
5–6	−0.129 (0.128)	−0.147 (0.129)	−0.203 (0.130)
Economic pressure (reference: no)	0.205 (0.075)**	0.204 (0.075)*	0.180 (0.075)*
Rural residence (reference: urban)	−0.011 (0.114)	−0.013 (0.257)	−0.033 (0.256)
Marital duration, y (reference: < 5)
5–10	0.023 (0.119)	0.032 (0.119)	0.040 (0.119)
11–14	−0.064 (0.106)	−0.040 (0.105)	−0.037 (0.106)
≥ 15	−0.238 (0.107)*	−0.216 (0.106)*	−0.213 (0.106)*
Childless (reference: no)	0.220 (0.079)**	0.218 (0.079)**	0.219 (0.079)**
Husband history of extramarital relationship (reference: no)	1.167 (0.148)**	1.169 (0.148)**	1.189 (0.148)**
Intergenerational exposure to violence (reference: no)	1.101 (0.071)**	1.107 (0.071)**	1.107 (0.071)**
Contextual variables
Community economic index	. . .	−0.084 (0.132)	−0.056 (0.132)
Community electricity	. . .	−0.191 (0.501)	−0.196 (0.498)
Community female education	. . .	0.058 (0.048)	0.061 (0.047)
Community gender norms	. . .	0.043 (0.203)	0.047 (0.202)
Community wife beating norms	. . .	0.144 (0.153)	0.145 (0.152)
District murder rate	. . .	. . .	0.063 (0.020)**
Random intercept for PSU level	0.283 (0.050)**	0.279 (0.023)**	0.276 (0.022)**

Note. PSU = primary sampling unit.

^aNumber of household items owned.

* P < .01; **P < .001.