TABLE 3—
Classification of At-Risk Status of Child Care Facilities: Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, 2000
| Above Moderate Threshold | Above High Threshold | |||||
| Radius of Circle, m | Consistent Positive | False Negative | False Positive | Consistent Positive | False Negative | False Positive |
| Absolute no. | ||||||
| 150 | 2075 | 127 | 148 | 512 | 52 | 79 |
| 100 | 578 | 75 | 90 | 112 | 33 | 36 |
| 50 | 15 | 17 | 14 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Classification rate, %a | ||||||
| 150 | 94.2 | 5.8 | 6.7 | 90.8 | 9.2 | 14.0 |
| 100 | 88.5 | 11.5 | 13.8 | 77.2 | 22.8 | 24.8 |
| 50 | 46.9 | 53.1 | 43.8 | 60.0 | 40.0 | 70.0 |
aPercentage of total facilities classified as at risk according to the reconciled data set for each threshold and radius.