TABLE 2—
Results of Negative Binomial Regression Analysis of Health Conditions: Filipino American Community Epidemiological Study, 1998–1999
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | Model 7 | Model 8 | Model 9 | Model 10 | |
| Age | 0.059*** (0.004) | 0.060*** (0.004) | 0.060*** (0.004) | 0.059*** (0.004) | 0.060*** (0.004) | 0.060*** (0.004) | 0.059*** (0.004) | 0.034*** (0.003) | 0.033*** (0.003) | 0.058*** (0.004) |
| Female gender | −0.083 (0.091) | −0.065 (0.092) | −0.073 (0.092) | −0.097 (0.092) | −0.075 (0.092) | −0.077 (0.092) | −0.100 (0.092) | 0.234*** (0.064) | 0.234*** (0.064) | −0.101 (0.093) |
| Years in US | 0.002 (0.003) | 0.002 (0.003) | 0.003 (0.003) | 0.004 (0.003) | 0.003 (0.003) | 0.003 (0.003) | 0.003 (0.003) | 0.001 (0.003) | 0.002 (0.003) | 0.004 (0.003) |
| Filipino language | −0.487** (0.169) | −0.517** (0.168) | −0.499** (0.169) | −0.479** (0.169) | −0.482** (0.169) | −0.498** (0.169) | −0.466** (0.169) | −0.341** (0.111) | −0.306** (0.110) | −0.447** (0.169) |
| Both languages | −0.128 (0.140) | −0.163 (0.139) | −1.68 (0.139) | −1.63 (0.139) | −1.80 (0.139) | −0.180 (0.139) | −0.165 (0.139) | −0.145 (0.091) | −0.137 (0.090) | −0.161 (0.138) |
| Education | 0.014 (0.010) | 0.012 0.010) | 0.004 (0.011) | 0.006 (0.011) | 0.005 (0.011) | 0.001 (0.011) | 0.003 (0.011) | −0.006 (0.007) | 0.000 (0.007) | 0.009 (0.011) |
| Employment | −0.376*** (0.098) | −0.392*** (0.099) | −0.403*** (0.099) | −0.395*** (0.099) | −0.397*** (0.098) | −0.401*** (0.098) | −0.389*** (0.098) | −0.393*** (0.069) | −0.379*** (0.068) | −0.393*** (0.098) |
| Negative life events | 0.100*** (0.023) | 0.085*** (0.023) | 0.083*** (0.023) | 0.075*** (0.022) | 0.080*** (0.023) | 0.080*** (0.024) | 0.073*** (0.022) | 0.070*** (0.016) | 0.074*** (0.016) | 0.075*** (0.022) |
| Ethnic identity | 0.195 (0.105) | 0.217* (0.105) | 0.230* (0.106) | 0.261* (0.106) | 0.230* (0.106) | 0.241* (0.107) | 0.262* (0.107) | 0.057 (0.065) | 0.036 (0.065) | 0.235* (0.105) |
| Emotional support | −0.318*** (0.094) | −0.284** (0.098) | −0.266** (0.099) | −0.273** (0.098) | −0.264** (0.100) | −0.465*** (0.144) | −0.400** (0.144) | −0.387*** (0.065) | −0.323*** (0.067) | −0.222* (0.103) |
| Instrumental support | 0.102 (0.069) | 0.092 (0.069) | 0.080 (0.069) | 0.075 (0.068) | 0.069 (0.069) | 0.050 (0.070) | 0.045 (0.069) | 0.163*** (0.050) | 0.368*** (0.066) | 0.186* (0.094) |
| Everyday discrimination | 0.197* (0.083) | 0.171* (0.085) | 0.430*** (0.117) | 0.218* (0.086) | 0.186* (0.086) | 0.407*** (0.117) | 0.213*** (0.058) | 0.215*** (0.057) | 0.432*** (0.118) | |
| 12-month discrimination | 0.031 (0.074) | 0.024 (0.075) | 0.030 (0.075) | 0.010 (0.074) | 0.017 (0.075) | 0.014 (0.075) | 0.050 (0.048) | 0.048 (0.047) | 0.037 (0.074) | |
| San Francisco | 0.168 (0.116) | 0.169 (0.112) | 0.170 (0.115) | 0.208 (0.116) | 0.200 (0.112) | 0.282*** (0.081) | 0.262*** (0.080) | 0.155 (0.110) | ||
| D _ SF | −0.423** (0.147) | −0.351* (0.158) | −0.412** (0.150) | |||||||
| D _ ES | 0.247 (0.145) | 0.315 (0.267) | ||||||||
| SF _ ES | 0.365* (0.183) | 0.269 (0.180) | ||||||||
| D _ SF _ ES | −0.249 (0.311) | |||||||||
| D _ IS | −0.088 (0.061) | −0.277 (0.164) | ||||||||
| SF _ IS | −0.375*** (0.084) | −0.231 (0.122) | ||||||||
| D _ SF _ IS | 0.393* (0.197) | |||||||||
| Intercept | −1.281*** (0.091) | −1.213*** (0.090) | −1.280*** (0.105) | −1.275*** (0.103) | −1.275*** (0.104) | −1.286*** (0.104) | −1.259*** (0.101) | 0.002 (0.067) | 0.006 (0.066) | −1.236*** (0.102) |
Note. ES = emotional support; IS = instrumental support; D = everyday discrimination; SF = San Francisco. Coefficients shown are with standard errors in parentheses. An underscore indicates an interaction term.
* P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001.