Skip to main content
. 2006 Jun;96(6):1085–1090. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.053595

TABLE 4—

Effects of HIV Intervention on Psychosocial Mediators

6-Month Assessment 12-Month Assessment
Measure Intervention Group, Unadjusted Mean (SD) Comparison Group, Unadjusted Mean (SD) Intervention Group, Unadjusted Mean (SD) Comparison Group, Unadjusted Mean (SD) GEE Model Adjusted Mean Difference (95% Confidence Interval) P
HIV knowledge (range: 0–18) 11.65 (2.73) 10.00 (3.27) 11.75 (2.55) 10.21 (3.32) 1.79 (1.00, 2.57) .0001
Condom attitudes (range: 8–40) 37.69 (3.11) 35.56 (4.54) 36.42 (4.26) 35.29 (4.50) 1.81 (0.79, 2.83) .005
Partner-related condom barriers (range: 10–50) 38.62 (15.19) 45.32 (16.43) 40.49 (15.41) 42.85 (14.48) −5.51 (−9.21, −1.82) .05
Condom use self-efficacy (range: 9–45) 35.66 (9.47) 32.08 (9.83) 36.42 (9.54) 32.92 (9.50) 3.21 (0.39, 6.04) .04
Demonstrated skill in applying condoms (range: 0–6) 4.38 (0.91) 3.30 (1.40) 4.17 (1.28) 3.68 (1.28) 1.03 (0.68, 1.38) .0001

Note. GEE = generalized estimating equation. Mean differences were adjusted by baseline value of outcome variable and theoretical covariates (douching, gang involvement, and pregnancy desire in previous 30 days).