Skip to main content
. 2006 May;80(9):4546–4556. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.9.4546-4556.2006

TABLE 2.

Colocalization of PrPSc and cell-type-specific markers in HY TME-infected hamster tongue

Antibodya Regionb Average overlap coefficient (MOC)c
HY TME M2 coefficientd
Mock HY TME
PGP 9.5 LP 0.017 ± 0.008 0.147 ± 0.023* 0.78
SNAP-25 LP 0.185 ± 0.082 0.083 ± 0.027 NA
Synaptobrevin-2 LP 0.045 ± 0.149 0.223 ± 0.063* 0.65
PGP 9.5 TB 0.005 ± 0.003 0.081 ± 0.012* 0.36
SNAP-25 TB 0.022 ± 0.008 0.097 ± 0.013* 0.44
Synaptobrevin-2 TB 0.037 ± 0.009 0.134 ± 0.028* 0.52
α-Gustducin TB 0.049 ± 0.015 0.033 ± 0.012 NA
PGP 9.5 SSE 0.021 ± 0.007 0.148 ± 0.011* 0.73
SNAP-25 SSE 0.007 ± 0.003 0.014 ± 0.010 NA
Synaptobrevin-2 SSE 0.068 ± 0.020 0.131 ± 0.025 NA
Cytokeratin SSE 0.031 ± 0.007 0.077 ± 0.004* 0.95
a

Antibodies used in conjunction with anti-PrP monoclonal 3F4 antibody for confocal microscopy studies.

b

Confocal images were cropped to either the lamina propria (LP), taste bud (TB), or stratified squamous epithelium (SSE) for colocalization analysis.

c

Overlap coefficient after Manders ± standard error of the mean, n = 10. *, P ≤ 0.005, using Student's t test or the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. A P value of <0.05 indicated a significant difference between the mock- and HY TME-infected groups.

d

Colocalization coefficient M2 indicates the percentage of PrPSc that overlaps with the cell-type-specific marker in the region of analysis in HY TME-infected hamster tongue. NA, not applicable since there was no statistical difference between HY TME- and mock-infected groups.