Skip to main content
. 2006 May;80(10):4949–4961. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.10.4949-4961.2006

TABLE 1.

Protection against EDIM shedding after i.n. immunization with VP6/LT(R192G) in neonatal and adult BALB/c mice challenged at 10, 28, or 42 dpi

Groupa Time of challenge (dpi) n Quantity of antigen shed (ng/mouse/day)b % Protectionc
Mock-immunized neonates 8 2,424 ± 4,843
VP6-immunized neonates 10 8 7,166 ± 17,497d,f 0
Mock-immunized neonates 7 1,817 ± 2,414
VP6-immunized neonates 28 8 426 ± 2,074e 76.6
Mock-immunized neonates 9 4,072 ± 5,399
VP6-immunized neonates 42 7 63 ± 224e 98.5
Mock-immunized adults 8 2,555 ± 3,820
VP6-immunized adults 10 8 290 ± 747e,g 88.6
Mock-immunized adults 8 4,384 ± 6,161
VP6-immunized adults 28 8 97 ± 262e 97.8
Mock-immunized adults 8 3,063 ± 4,370
VP6-immunized adults 42 7 51 ± 137e 98.3
a

Neonates were immunized at 7 days of age, and adults were immunized at ≥6 weeks of age.

b

Mean quantity of rotavirus antigen shed ± standard deviation (SD) over 7 days postchallenge (ng/mouse/day).

c

Percent protection represents the percent decrease in mean quantity of rotavirus antigen shed during the 7 days after challenge compared to that for mock-immunized mice.

d

Significantly (P = 0.007) greater than mock-immunized mice.

e

Significantly (P ≤ 0.003) less than mock-immunized mice.

f

Significantly (P ≤ 0.001) greater than immunized neonatal mice challenged at 28 or 42 dpi or immunized adult mice challenged at 10, 28, or 42 dpi.

g

Significantly (P ≤ 0.04) greater than immunized adult mice challenged at 28 or 42 dpi.