Skip to main content
. 2006 May 15;103(21):8012–8017. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509718103

Table 1.

Observed and simulated diversity statistics for the Tuscan (T) and Etruscan (E) samples based on mtDNA sequences

Data set Haplotype no.
Haplotype diversity
Nucleotide diversity
Average pairwise difference
Haplotype sharing
FST
T E T E T E T E T E E-T
Observed 40 22 0.938 ± 0.015 0.944 ± 0.018 0.014 ± 0.008 0.011 ± 0.006 3.9 ± 2.0 5.0 ± 2.5 0.050 0.091 0.024
Model 1 49 27 0.980 0.963 0.353 0.353 127.1 127.2 0.000 0.000 0.015
Model 2 43 26 0.975 0.960 0.160 0.159 57.5 57.4 0.067 0.145 0.016
Model 3 46 26 0.977 0.960 0.160 0.160 57.7 57.6 0.065 0.120 0.015
Model 4 36 17 0.955 0.908 0.019 0.016 6.7 5.9 0.194 0.412 0.016
Model 4′ 7 4 0.705 0.466 0.002 0.002 0.7 0.6 0.571 0.250 0.012
Model 5 33 15 0.946 0.889 0.946 0.013 5.5 4.8 0.200 0.421 0.017
Model 6 36 18 0.957 0.916 0.019 0.017 6.8 6.1 0.054 0.111 0.027
Model 7 37 18 0.960 0.919 0.019 0.017 6.9 6.2 0.092 0.188 0.023
Model 8 36 17 0.956 0.914 0.021 0.019 7.7 6.8 0.056 0.118 0.027
Model 9 36 18 0.957 0.916 0.018 0.017 6.6 6.0 0.057 0.111 0.027
Model 10 36 17 0.956 0.916 0.022 0.020 7.9 7.3 0.059 0.125 0.027

Haplotype no. is the number of distinct haplotypes; haplotype diversity is a measure of expected heterozygosity; haplotype sharing represents the fraction of haplotypes in one population that are also found in the other; FST represents between group diversity. Data are medians of the 1,000 simulations performed for each evolutionary scenario. The simulated parameters that differed significantly from the observed values (see Table 2) are in italics.