Table 2.
Simulated data set | Haplotype no. |
Haplotype diversity |
Nucleotide diversity |
Average pairwise difference |
Haplotype sharing |
FST |
χ2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T | E | T | E | T | E | T | E | T | E | E-T | ||
Model 1 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0060 | 0.0060 | 0.0005 | 106.4 |
Model 2 | 0.1150 | 0.0210 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.8250 | 0.8580 | 0.0005 | 88.1 |
Model 3 | 0.0010 | 0.0210 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.7010 | 0.7000 | 0.0005 | 97.5 |
Model 4 | 0.2030 | 0.0460 | 0.4960 | 0.1660 | 0.4240 | 0.3460 | 0.4060 | 0.3280 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.1860 | 21.7 |
Model 4′ | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0040 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.3880 | 88.9 |
Model 5 | 0.0430 | 0.0160 | 0.9440 | 0.0900 | 0.7660 | 0.6520 | 0.7450 | 0.6300 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.3300 | 23.2 |
Model 6 | 0.2300 | 0.1220 | 0.3740 | 0.3140 | 0.3960 | 0.2820 | 0.3880 | 0.2620 | 0.8240 | 0.8100 | 0.6920 | 16.7 |
Model 7 | 0.3380 | 0.1260 | 0.3180 | 0.3840 | 0.3220 | 0.2680 | 0.3180 | 0.2480 | 0.1750 | 0.1520 | 0.8420 | 15.9 |
Model 8 | 0.2290 | 0.0630 | 0.4620 | 0.2240 | 0.3340 | 0.3040 | 0.3240 | 0.2900 | 0.7180 | 0.6580 | 0.6680 | 18.5 |
Model 9 | 0.2590 | 0.0750 | 0.4180 | 0.2920 | 0.4340 | 0.2840 | 0.4220 | 0.2640 | 0.7400 | 0.7020 | 0.6880 | 17.2 |
Model 10 | 0.2370 | 0.0820 | 0.4520 | 0.2920 | 0.3400 | 0.2440 | 0.3200 | 0.2200 | 0.6480 | 0.6080 | 0.7320 | 17.9 |
In our case, the χ2 was calculated based on seven statistics (haplotype number, haplotype diversity, and average pairwise difference for each population and FST between the two populations). The χ2 values that are not significant are given in italics. E, Etruscans; T, Tuscans.