Skip to main content
. 2006 May 15;103(21):8024–8029. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600536103

Table 4.

Comparison of clinical EAE courses in male and female progeny of B6 females × B6, B6.YA, and B6.Yaa male consomic mice elicited by using the double MOG35–55 plus CFA induction protocol

Mice Incidence
Clinical disease traits
% n CDS PS DA SI
B6 100 20 38.6 3.3 13.8 2.6
B6.YA 82 16 24.5 3.1 13.8 2.2
B6.Yaa 53 15 9.4 2.3 10.1 1.7
χ2 11.9 F 21.1 5.9 12.1 8.6
P 0.003 P <10−3 0.006 <10−3 0.001
CDS: B6 > B6.YA > B6.Yaa
PS: B6 = B6.YA > B6.Yaa
DA: B6 = B6.YA > B6.Yaa
SI: B6 > B6.YA = B6.Yaa

CDS, mean cumulative disease score; PS, mean peak score; DA, mean days affected; SI, mean severity index.