Table 3.
Log2-ratio vs. -ΔΔCT | log2-int vs. -ΔCT | ||||||||
Pearson | p | Spearman | p | Pearson | p | Spearman | p | ||
AFFYMETRIX | med | 0.91 | 0.001 | 0.87 | 0.017 | 0.79 | 0.031 | 0.84 | 0.016 |
max | 1 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 0.97 | |||||
AMERSHAM | med | 0.72 | 0.105 | 0.54 | 0.297 | 0.77 | 0.029 | 0.9 | 0.027 |
max | 0.92 | 0.88 | 1 | 1 | |||||
AGILENT | med | 0.92 | 0.039 | 0.76 | 0.208 | ||||
max | 1 | 1 |
Shown are median (med) and maximum (max) Pearson and Spearman rank correlation coefficients calculated from all pair-wise combinations between all replicate arrays and for all cell lines. The median p values (p) from all of the tests are also shown. We are presenting 2 types of comparisons depending on the type transformation used: log2-ratios platform data versus (vs.) -ΔΔCt QRT-PCR data; and log2-intensities (for the one-color platforms) versus -ΔCt QRT-PCR data. Only array data points for 12 out of the 14 genes that were available for all platforms were included in the calculations.