Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Jun 2.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2005 Aug;12(4):271–277. doi: 10.1080/09286580591003815

TABLE 4.

Results of the Analysis of Unadjusted Scores for In-Clinic vs. Telephone Instruments

In-clinic vs. telephone Estimated correlation coefficient 95% Confidence Interval
3MS vs. TICS-M ρ = 0.44 (0.40, 0.49)
Logical Memory I ρ = 0.67 {0.64, 0.69)
Logical Memory II ρ = 0.71 (0.68, 0.73)
Letter Fluency ρ = 0.79 (0.77, 0.81)
Animal Category ρ= 0.62 (0.58, 0.65)
Digits Backward ρ = 0.35 (0.31, 0.40)
Composite ρ = 0.77 (0.74, 0.79)