Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Jun 2.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2005 Aug;12(4):271–277. doi: 10.1080/09286580591003815

TABLE 5.

Results of the Analysis of Adjusted Scores for In-Clinic vs. Telephone Instruments

In-clinic vs. telephone Estimated correlation coefficient 95% Confidence Interval
3MS vs. TICS-M ρ = 0.89 (0.88, 0.90)
Logical Memory I ρ = 0.87 (0.86, 0.88)
Logical Memory II ρ = 0.86 (0.84, 0.87)
Letter Fluency ρ = 0.71 (0.68, 0.74)
Animal Category ρ = 0.82 (0.81, 0.84)
Digits Backward ρ = 0.79 {0.76, 0.81)
Composite ρ = 0.83 (0.81, 0.84)