Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Jun 5.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Oct 21;12(12):1005–1016. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2005.03.536

TABLE 3.

Flow cytometric analysis of selected T-cell surface markers (after minus before) after anti-CTLA-4 and IL-2 treatment in selected patients

Patient no. HLA-DR+ (CD3+CD4+) HLA-DR+ (CD3+CD4) CD45RO+ (CD3+CD4+) CD45RO+ (CD3+CD4) CD69+ (CD3+CD4+) CD69+ (CD3+ CD4) CD25+ (CD4+)
4a 7.3% 7.2% 7.4% 5.5% 5.2% 7.5% 7.9%
5 −15.4% −26.7% 2.8% −1.0% −14.3% −5.1% −5.1%
6 11.4% −5.6% 1.8% 6.3% 34.2% 27.9% 12.7%
8a 12.1% 5.1% 4.4% 5.9% 7.8% 7.0% 5.0%
9 7.5% 11.1% −.7% −15.2% 41.1% 39.1% 10.1%
10 11.1% 11.5% .9% −5.9% −2.4% −9.4% .9%
11 −6.3% 6.3% −11.7% −5.5% −9.4% −7.6% −1.1%
12a 9.8% 11.9% 10.7% −19.7% −18.7% −10.3% 14.6%
13 7.4% 9.8% 17.5% −2.2% .9% −2.8% 18.4%
14a 28.1% 13.0% 2.3% 1.4% −11.4% 1.1% .8%
15a 13.6% 16.4% 4.8% 2.1% −9.6% −10.1% 16.3%
16 8.2% 7.9% 2.4% −1.1% 8.9% −2.5% 1.1%
17 5.9% −2.5% 1.4% −.2% 13.1% 14.9% 1.6%
18 7.3% 15.8% 9.3% −1.3% 1.3% 2.6% 6.4%
19a −6.5% −16.2% 6.2% −9.5% −30.2% −10.2% −.3%
20a −.1% 15.3% .2% −17.5% −48.0% −33.8% −2.4%
22 4.7% 12.5% −3.0% −4.3% 2.7% 2.8% −4.6%
23 −1.1% 10.1% 3.6% 7.9% .1% .8% 1.2%
24 11.8% 15.0% 2.0% 16.1% .3% 2.5% 4.8%
25 10.3% 7.3% −.7% 2.3% 1.0% 11.9% 11.4%
26 −2.0% −3.7% 11.5% 2.6% 14.4% 8.5% 7.5%
27 11.0% 10.9% 1.4% −2.3% −6.6% −7.3% 5.6%
28a 21.2% 24.5% 8.3% −2.6% 12.2% −2.2% 6.6%
29 8.6% 17.1% 11.3% 21.4% −.2% 2.5% 1.0%
30 1.0% 1.5% 3.5% −5.3% 0.5% 3.9% 2.3%
32 13.4% 28.1% 6.5% 8.1% 21.6% 16.8% −3.4%
34 10.1% 7.0% 4.8% −6.3% 3.2% 2.6% −5.8%
35 1.4% −11.0% 7.5% 1.1% −2.2% −4.8% −3.7%
Mean change 6.9% 7.1% 4.2% −.7% .6% 1.7% 3.9%
P valueb .0003 .0033 .0004 .6871 .8672 .5184 .0041

CTLA, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen; IL, interleukin.

a

Objective clinical responders.

b

Two-tailed P value using the paired t-test.