Skip to main content
. 2006 May 12;7(6):445–451. doi: 10.1631/jzus.2006.B0445

Table 4.

Comparison of positive ratio and specificity of three markers in peripheral blood detected by real-time and conventional RT-PCR respectively

CEA CK19 CK20
Present study P (%) 35.7 40.5 28.6
S (%) 96.7 96.7 93.3
Previous real-time RT-PCR detection P (%) 24.8 (Schuster et al., 2004); 52.9 (Öberg et al., 2004) 20.2 (Hardingham et al., 2000) 22.2 (Giribaldi et al., 2006)
S (%) 100 (Schuster et al., 2004) 97.8 (Stathopoulou et al., 2003) 100 (Giribaldi et al., 2006)
Conventional RT-PCR detection P (%) 69 (Fiorella et al., 2001) 64 (Wong et al., 2001); 75 (Gradilone et al., 2003) 30 (Vlems et al., 2002); 44.8 (Zhang et al., 2003)
S (%) 96.7 (Fiorella et al., 2001); 94 (Piva et al., 2000) 81 (Wong et al., 2001); 71 (Ko et al., 2000) 78.7 (Vlems et al., 2002);76 (Jung et al., 1999)

Note: P: Positive ratio (%); S: Specificity (%)