Skip to main content
. 2006 Mar 10;78(5):770–777. doi: 10.1086/503712

Table 5.

Results of Analyses of Association between rs2297660 and SBWT[Note]

CrudeAnalysis
AdjustedAnalysisa
Group and
rs2297660
Genotype
No. of
Women
Mean (±SD)
SBWT
β SE P β SE P
Screening study:
 CC 130 −.58 ± .88 Ref Ref
 AC 63 −.08 ± .80 .50 .13 .0002 .48 .13 .0004
 AA 11 .16 ± 1.11 .74 .29 .01 .67 .29 .02
  Additiveb −.05 ± .85 .44 .11 .00004 .41 .11 .0001
Validation study:
 CC 541 −.26 ± .98 Ref Ref
 AC 245 −.14 ± 1.02 .12 .08 .12 .11 .08 .14
 AA 46 .03 ± .99 .29 .15 .06 .26 .15 .08
  Additiveb −.11 ± 1.02 .13 .06 .025 .12 .06 .035
Pooled analysis:
 CC 671 −.32 ± .97 Ref Ref
 AC 308 −.13 ± .98 .19 .07 .004 .19 .07 .005
 AA 57 .05 ± 1.00 .37 .14 .006 .35 .13 .01
  Additiveb −.10 ± .99 .19 .05 .0002 .18 .05 .0004

Note.— Ref = reference.

a

Controlled for age, parity, smoking, and BMI.

b

In additive model, CC = 0, AC = 1, and AA = 2.